>>18766968
What argument was the most convincing for you?

>>18766968
I don't remember if it disproves Buddhism or Platonism. Then, again, the only thing I remember from the book is the author's assertion that agnosticism is atheism for pussies.

>>18766968
If that book ruined your life you have an IQ delusion not a God delusion

>>18767002
*sighs* and why is that exactly?

>>18767013
Because its atheism for midwits

The whole time Dawkins was just arguing against god not God
Better put the demiurge

>>18767013
>*sighs*
Why do you type like this?

>>18767018
This

>>18767013
it's a low IQ book written for high school midwits and basically everything he wrote had already been debunked with generic articles from the Standford Encyclopedia of Philosophy which was largely created by atheists/agnostics
Even reddit is forced to admit the book is mid, so you know it's a steaming pile

Who cares what Dawkins thinks? He’s a pompous ass. He doesn’t know if there’s a god anymore then the pope does. No human knows what truly happens after we die anon. Do the best you can and hope that’s good enough. Either god will be waiting for you on the other side or you won’t care. Either way you’ll have lived an honest life.

>>18766968
I had my atheist phase instead of emo, juggalo or whatever subculture that was popular back then and I kinda regretted it.

And no wonder; for even Satan masquerades as yeast of mind

>>18766968
More religious freaks need to read this book.

>>18767261
Basic human empathy requires me call my opponents freaks, btw
>I am le buff gray man so tuff