>>18766541God is the greatest*
>If god real why bad thing?
>>18766541Theism is a gauge choice. The same complete history of events can be described in different metaphysical languages without changing the events themselves.One may describe the causal unfolding entirely in terms of nature, matter, institutions, psychology, contingency, and human action. Or one may describe that identical unfolding as a single divine act appearing through those very causes. Nothing observable needs to be added, removed, or rearranged.That is the analogy to gauge freedom in physics: changing the description does not change the trajectory.So logic cannot rule theism out merely by giving a complete natural or historical explanation. “We can explain what happened without mentioning God” establishes only that God is unnecessary as an additional cause alongside the others. It does not establish that the whole causal actuality cannot itself be understood theistically.Hence “there is no evidence” often really means:“Nothing inside the field forces me to change gauges.”And that is substantially more modest than:“The field contains no evidence naturally readable as divine dependence.”
>Hates religion, particularly of the hateful Bible>Tries to start a new hateful religion against the Bible>Welcomes the hateful responses he knows he will getWhy did he do it?
>>18766580Yeah, why?
>>18766658just look at the thread >>>18764466
>>18766664That thread answered absolutely nothing and just consisted of inane vague nothingburgers on the chirtcuck's part
>>18766658God is kind of an asshole sometimesread the speeches of God in the book of Hiobthis is why we are commanded / recommended to be good to each other to make life in this dogshit punishment realm a little bit easier (this is also book of Hiob, but you have to read in between the lines)but alas most people are too nihilistic and solipsistic to ever entertain the other guy's POV, which is the reason for so much unnecessary violence, bloodshed and suffering
>>18766680>gave a reason why natural evils exist>gave a reason why moral evils exist>gave a reason for being created on earth first>"It actually said nothing."you are disingenuous and not actually looking for an answer
>>18766658God is bad
>>18766613Do you guys think he’s in hell?
>>18766708>gave a reason why natural evils exist>gave a reason why moral evils exist>gave a reason for being created on earth firstNone of them were legitimate and all of them relied on meaningless semantic gobbledygook. You are disingenuous and use ill-defined terms.
>>18766994maybe god liked his moxie and intervened o algo
>>18766998Ok what terms do you want defined and what problems do you have
>>18766998>None of them were legitimate and all of them relied on meaningless semantic gobbledygook. You are disingenuous and use ill-defined terms.Is this some copypasta?It has that mindless low IQ vibe in that it can apply to any topic yet says absolutely nothing of substance about the topic in question but instead resorts to baseless generic accusations.
