Why did every country and every race and every culture universally hate women and view them as subhumans for thousands of years until the 1900s?
I didn't understand her argument.
>>18764419notice how she didn't mention short guys.
>>18764973Or guys with small dicks... I'm pretty sure she's actually made fun of both of them.
>>18764419i honestly don't think there was a society that treated women worse than northern/western european didthey were the ones who burnt women en masse for "witchcraft"they were the ones who mutilated womens' bodies with chainsaws in order to deliver babiesthey were the ones to lock women in mental institutions for having medical emergenciesthey were the ones who made women change their last names upon marriagethey were the ones to force women to wear bikinis and other revealing clothing via coercive propagandanot even the taliban treated women this horribly
>>18765206aisha said the happiest women were christian
>>18765206>they were the ones who burnt women en masse for "witchcraft"Lol>they were the ones who mutilated womens' bodies with chainsaws in order to deliver babies?? C-section? Are you serious?>they were the ones to lock women in mental institutions for having medical emergenciesBut this is based and psychos shouldn't be on the streets>they were the ones who made women change their last names upon marriageSo did plenty of other cultures. What?>they were the ones to force women to wear bikinis and other revealing clothing via coercive propagandaNow I know you're trolling.>not even the taliban treated women this horriblyI will agree with you there. Taliban treats them better than the US does.
>>18764419Not true. I was reading anti-gay writings from the 1700s and they’re ALL about worshipping foids as the most virtuous amazing sex and how evil gay men are for spurning them
>>18764419>1900sfoid worship has always been a thing in all Indo-Euro cultures
>>18764419Is she retarded or just trolling?
>>18765206This is the closest to reality that the feminist mind can get, the complete rejection of it. Either that or you're trying way too hard with your trolling.>>18764419They genuinely didn't. European culture in particular practically worshipped women, giving them more and more protections until they started demanding rights, and were given them pretty much overnight and with no struggle whatsoever (compare the Suffragette movement and its treatment to, say, the Chartists - or any of the other male lead suffrage movements if you need an example of that).
>>18765617>So did plenty of other cultures. What?hispanic, arab, chinese, and korean women never did
>>18766734if you're using retaining a surname after marriage as evidence that arabs and chinese are more feminist than north euros...lol, just lol
>>18766744the fact that arab and hispanic women had better property and economic rights than anglos historically
Women have killed over 2 billion babies since the 1980s and openly support child killers. I never ever want to hear anything from a woman ever again.
>>18764419The feminist position holds that human culture begins with the repression of women.
>>18766784Did they really? You don't really need your own property rights when you're married since you share everything, and when the husband was away his wife was always left in charge. And atleast in urban areas wives tended to do side business on their own. Finally if the wife outlived her husband she would be fully emancipated.Don't see how it could have been much better other than that unmarried women had little to no autonomy, but nobody gave unmarried women autonomy, did they?
>>18764419>"men don't face criticism about their bodies"Delusional as fuck. If it's not to our faces, it's indirectly by separating and ostracizing us.
