Why do I keep reading this ridiculous and blatantly false claim everywhere? 500 years ago Iberians were at the top, 300 years ago the French were. It was only with the defeat of Napoleon that northern Europe arrived at the top.
>>18763967The French at the top were Northern EuropeansTraditional langue d'Oil France is certified Nordic, especially the Frankish aristocracy before the revolution.
>>18763967We weren't on the top? Cool. No need for us to pay reparations.
>>18763967Whites have been at the top ever since they stepped off the boats from 'Atlantis' 12k years ago.
>>18763983its funny seeing retards getting memed into thinking some guys literal oc donut steal civilization is a real thing and making their own oc donut steal theories about it
>>18763977Napoleon entire existence is pretty much an antonym for northern europeans.
>>18763993>Napoleon
>>18763993>Rule for like, slightly longer than Trump>Demographically suicide France and end French hegemony foreverUh huh
>>18763996>Brownoid who think he is whiteMany such cases
>>18764023his son would be an aryan poster boy if he was born in nazi germany
>>18763967Last two times the Nordics mattered was when the Kingdom of Rus had its capital at Kiev and then again when Sweden controlled more land than Russia for a while.Russia has always been Oriental/Asiatic.
>>18764115Yeah because he fucked a white womanI bet you think Jeremy Meeks is white because his eyes are blue
>>18764003The France birthrate was already stagnating since the mid XVIII Century, much earlier than any other european country and for reasons still unknow
>>18764273The Napoleonic wars straight up wiped out 38% of an entire generation of men.
>>18763967I wanted to shill for north euros but then remembered I'm actually slavic.
>>18763977>The French at the top were Northern EuropeansThis level of cope is unheard.
>>18763967French and Slavic gods always rape germs
>>18764213he fucked a woman darker than him wtf
>>18763996napoleon was southern italian of arab origin. His ancestors was an arab trader called the "Moor of Sarzane" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_BonaparteAccording to studies by G. Lucotte and his coauthors based on DNA research since 2011, Napoleon Bonaparte belonged to Y-DNA (direct male ancestry) haplogroup E1b1b1c1* (E-M34*). This 15000-year-old haplogroup has its highest concentration in Ethiopia and in the Near East (Jordan, Yemen). According to the authors of the study, "Probably Napoléon also knew his remote oriental patrilineal origins, because Francesco Buonaparte (the Giovanni son), who was a mercenary under the orders of the Genoa Republic in Ajaccio in 1490, was nicknamed The Maure of Sarzane." The latest study identifies the common Bonaparte DNA markers from Carlo (Charles) Bonaparte to 3 living descendants.[7][8]Lucotte et al. published in October 2013 the extended Y-STR of Napoleon I based on descendant testing, and the descendants were E-M34, just like the emperor's beard hair tested a year before. The persons tested were the patrilineal descendants of Jérome Bonaparte, one of Napoleon's brothers, and of Alexandre Colonna-Walewski, Napoleon's illegitimate son with Marie Walewska. These three tests all yielded the same Y-STR haplotype (109 markers) confirming with 100% certainty that the first Emperor of the French belonged to the M34 branch of haplogroup E1b1b.
>>18763967Flanders was probably one of the most important regions in all of Medieval Europe. Since the late Roman period industry has been gradually moving from the Mediterranean to the Rhine and Po rivers.
>>18763967Civilizational trajectories can be accurately predicted from 1500 AD, and ancestry-adjusted state history explains 56% of the variance in log per capita income (https://archive.li/gSSdm)."The DoSB’s editorial staff includes experts in Arabic, Indian, and East Asian science drawn from universities around the world. Consistent criteria are applied to the choice of who does and does notgain admittance.What makes the DoSB even better for our purposes is that the core 14 volumes first appeared in 1970 and the last two supplemental volumes were issued in 1990, giving the editors two decades to hear about omissions—decades in which such sources were under intense scrutiny for omissions of women, non-whites, and non-Europeans. It seems reasonableto conclude that the DoSB in its present form has been as thoroughly cleansed of Eurocentric bias as it is possible for a source to be.""81% of the set in the DoSB comes from Europe compared to 76% in the Human Accomplishment set, rising to 94% and 91% when North America is included.""On the face of it, the DoSB has been as carefully assembled as any scholarly endeavor of its kind ever has been. It is incumbent on those who continue to allege Eurocentrism to specify the names and contributions of the large numbers of important Asian and Arabic scientists and mathematicians who have been left out, or to explain why some thousands of the European entries don’t belong."https://archive.org/details/humanaccomplishmentthepursuitofexcellenceintheartsandsciences800b.c.to1950charlesmurray
>>18764568>MurrayYeah I'm not going to read all dat
>>18764299>Fear the Norman bvllSissy Anglo-Arabs post?
>>18764568A human acomplishment points, nice, this may be peak of arbitary and the peak of coping.
>>18763980no one is asking you to chud, take your meds
>>18764554>napolion was a shit-skin and thats why infinity niggers and poop-jeets foreverfuck off back to hell
>>18764568>no eurocentric bias >somehow, no account for whatever was achieved in the americas independently of europe, or asia that wasn't done by europeans>gguuhhh human accomplishment points no eurocentric biassObviously done by a white supremacist pretending he isn't one
>>18764299Northern half of France (minus African immigrants) is still Northern European today. There is simply nothing med about it, it's like an even more autistic mirror of England.
>>18764915we wuz french n shiet
>>18764586>no answer. Too scared to read>>18764749>esoteric and strange ad homs>>18764914>muh White supremacy!Okay? Your retarded accusation does nothing to disprove the DoSB's data, nor Murrays collection of encyclopedias. Congratulations.
