Historically, what made Slavic Bolshevik legions undeniably more powerful, masculine and virile compared to their weak western fascist counterparts?
>>18761828>undeniably more powerfulThey weren't though. Objectively. They were more numerous, though. Germans killed like 4 or 5 Bolsheviks for every man of their own that died and the Bolsheviks simply replaced them and marched more men into the meat grinder until the Germans could no longer keep up the fight. The only thing the communists do well is march to their deaths. They don't really outfight or outmaneuver their enemy, they just overwhelm with numbers until the enemy retreats. As a result their troops don't actually have a lot of experience fighting. The ones who see action tend to die quickly, and the ones who march victoriously into the enemy's city saw little fighting.
Asiatic rapeBVLL genes. Germanic sissies were having a collective PMS because their "males" are all cursed with Klinefelter (Germanic name. Coincidence? I think not!) syndrome and thus experience hormonal imbalances and accompanying mood swings normally reserved for the females of the species. Only the Prussians had a meager fraction of masculine slavic power in their blood and they were wiped out to a one when they collectively acked themselves in shame at the end of the war. Slavs took mercy on this pathetic genetic trash and injected some of their superior genetics into the German gene pool through the theraputic rape of their women (although it can be difficult for the untrained eye to tell the difference between germanic females and "males." Especially when the males seem especially eager for posing as women for the purpose of homosexual encounters)
>>18761833>They don't really outfight or outmaneuver their enemyIt's incredible that people are still repeating that. Even more so because no historian ever said that and it all comes from loser German generals who wanted explain their colossal failure somehow.
>>18761833>Germans killed like 4 or 5 Bolsheviks for every man of their own that diednope, germans just murder a lot of POW's that they manage to get due to the sneaky suprise attack, then they spend the next 4 years getting raped by the Bolshevism
>>18761861>shows maneuver only possible because they overwhelmed Germans with sheer numbers on every frontnot beating the allegations
>>18762343Quantity is the most important quality.
>>18762346>>18761861does quantity make Russian mothers less sad when their babies die?I highly suspect these threads are by jewish trash who want to foment a kind of flame war where Europeans celebrate killing each other.just laugh at these threads and send money to Hamas or Iran.Reminder the Israelis lost because theyre short, ugly, dysgenics from eastern Europe, these are not the sons of Abraham whom they erroneously call "Avi", they are dysgenic non-human garbage.>MY REBBE TOLD ME DA GOYIMS HATE MEyeah, because you are fucking goblins who ruin everything they touch>HASHEM BLESSED US WITH SUCCESSif you were successful your meme state wouldnt be losing wars to Iran, you wouldnt be so fucking ugly, and you wouldnt rely on criminal mafias to get ahead in life, you also wouldnt lie about your IQ scores.Hashen DID bless someone, Jesus Christ and the Christian Europeans, who miraculously are taller, more beautiful, and more well armed than da joos despite everything theyve been through.
>>18761833>They don't really outfight or outmaneuver their enemy, they just overwhelm with numbers until the enemy retreats.Not only is that bullshit if you've read anything about Operation Barbarossa beyond memes, but why is "hurr durr they only won because they had more dudes" an argument when talking about Operation Barbarossa but never when talking about Husky, the invasions of Poland, Denmark and Norway, Beiping-Tianjin, D-Day or Tunisia?
>>18761828Bolsheviks are just superior
>>18762382Because those operations did not succeed only because of a massively wasteful expense of human life, unlike basically everything the Soviets did in WW2. This is inarguable, even when you look at the casualties they sustained. Their only strategy was "throw bodies at the front until they run out of bullets / supplies". There isn't a single front where they won through maneuver or tactical use of force. When the other Allies had overwhelming numbers, they managed to use them effectively to quickly overrun positions, instead of simply marching them into machine guns and mortars. Even D-Day, touted among Americans for its losses, was nothing compared to Stalingrad or any other Eastern hellhole where Soviets were in charge. American losses in Normandy were a cakewalk compared to virtually anywhere in the east, because American military theory doesn't treat human life as expendable.
>>18761828germtrannies always get raped and genocided by Slavic Bvlls
>>18761828Russian communists were famously ill equipped peasants sent by the tens of thousands into hopeless battles to die.
Bolshevism is an indomitable, unstoppable force
>>18762389The soviets had inferior equipment and weren't outnumbering the nazis much for half the war
>>18761828
