[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
4chan
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.




File: images(102).png (1 KB, 275x182)
1 KB PNG
Do other asians think chinese sounds absolutely hideous aswell?
>>
>>18759969
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Chinese
>>
Mods deleted the Pompeii papyrus thread but leaves this shit up.
>>
>>18759962
I know japs definitely do.
>>
>>18759962
Have you heard any other Asian language besides Japanese and Chinese? Most are positively horrific on the ears. Try listening to Thai, Khmer, Hindi, or Vietnamese sometime. Chinese is far from the worst.
>>
>>18759993
so are many other languages in Asia, including some of the ones that anon mentioned
>>
>>18759962
Chinese as a written language is absolutely based, especially classical chinese. Spoken, it varies, some are dogshit while some are pleasant to listen to.
>>
>>18759989
The worst accents in the world are Arabic, Paki/Indian and South Italian.
Everything else is tolerable
>>
Thai and Viet languages are also pretty fucking horrible.
>>
Korean, Vietnamese, and Thai sound awful as well.
>>
>>18761341
Don't bring Korean into this
>>
File: GzzybYCXgAA3dpK.png (1.2 MB, 959x1068)
1.2 MB PNG
>shur wur shur bey tao shu baoja kurr burr ji shi guomong kao shur
>>
>>18759980
mods are jewish natcons, fuck 'em
>>
Same film scene:

Cantonese

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=gVtxS9U92Ng&ra=m

Mandarin

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=39afZI04e-s&ra=m

Cantonese is disgusting.
>>
>>18759962

Vietnamese and tagalog sound flat out alien. Chinese is the 2nd best sounding language 2nd to Japanese
>>
>>18761341
Korean is fine, what are you smoking?
>>
>>18762323
Korean can sound extremely whiny.
>>
>>18759962
Mandarin is middle ground. Not beautiful, not hideous, just existing. No where near as bad as Cantonese or God forbid Thai. Thai is by far the worst sounding language in existence. Absolute hell on the ears.
>>
Language tier list based on sound
>Top tier
Arabic, French, Italian, Spanish
>Mid Tier
English and Japanese
>Low tier
German
>Shit tier
Hindi and every other East Asian language besides Japanese
>>
>>18759980
why was that thread so important to you that you cant let go
i think i need to go search the archives or some shit
>>
>>18763634
Hi Pierre
>>
File: fromage.png (400 KB, 732x609)
400 KB PNG
>>18763642
wee wee
>>
>>18759980
A true American patriot. Thank you, jannies.
>>
>>18759962
Chinese history is so horrifying that it loops back around to being funny
>>
>>18764961
Its warhammer 40k but not really.
>>
>>18763634
>Spanish
It can sound really cool, very musical y sexo
https://youtu.be/xiWtqVtd1Oo

I also think Turkish is underrated. (Not a Turk, just my opinion)
https://youtu.be/nB0Kdt_QQ-w
>>
>>18763634
>Arabic, French
Lmao what
>>
Japanese>Korean>Mandarin>>>Canto>>>>>>SEA assorted ear rape>>>>>>Jeetspeak
>>
File: 1792222025114655.gif (2.6 MB, 409x498)
2.6 MB GIF
>>18766425
Omlette du Fromage
>>
>>18763634
semitic languages sound like somebody trying to summon a demon.
>>
>>18764961

That's during a siege retard, numerous western cities have resorted to cannibalism under siege, and they slaughtered tens of thousands of barbarians.

The battle of Suiyang was between the barbarian, non-Han, non-Chinese forces of An Lushan's Yan dynasty (Khitans, Gokturks, Sogdians) and the Han Chinese forces of the Tang dynasty defending Suiyang.

The only 10,000 Han Chinese defenders slaughtered the besieging barbarian army killing 60,000 barbarians out of 150,000 barbarians while being outnumbered by over fifteen to one and permanently defeating An Lushan's attempt to invade southern China which stayed safe from the entire war. The barbarians were completely unable to enslave or rape the Han civilians of Suiyang after suffering massive losses.

The outnumbered Tang dynasty garrison in Suiyang slaughtered over six times the enemy when the enemy besieging force was over 15 times as large. The defenders of Suiyang were 10,000 soldiers with 30,000 civilians and the barbarian besiegers were 150,000. The 10,000 defenders killed 60,000 besieging barbarians.

If white people did this against a horde of 150,000 blacks you would call them heroes of the white race. You mock Suiyang and dismiss it as barbarism because you think it is between two Han sides so it was pointless fighting.
>>
>>18764961
>>18767073
The barbarian Yan army lost multiple times the number of deaths than the entire Tang dynasty army and civilian garrisons combined in Suiyang.

It's hilarious how you try to claim An Lushan as an Indo-European ubermensch (he was half Turk, he got hacked to death by his own Khitan eunuch and his own son, his son got killed by his friend, and his own general Gao Shuren led Khitan and Xi Mongolic soldiers to slaughter his Sogdian and Gokturk people under Ashina Chengqing in Fanyang (Beijing, Jicheng)

Gao Juren ordered the Khitan and Xi to toss Sogdian babies on spears and kill all big nosed people.

An Lushan lost the war and his people got massacred.

Then you try to cope by presenting Suiyang as a civil war between Han people, to make it seem as though the deaths were pointless, instead of Han soldiers slaughtering "Indo-European" barbarians who outnumbered them by ten times.
BTC
bc1qtm4rep7kyp2p28hlkfktpnd0j7uew47vnt2mev
LTC
ltc1q9xlaysse0mpfwf025esd69kt9zu3md22gh23du
ETH
0x6abA18D203520c8F90ca63eE7426a7bC345D98e6
SOL
E5ekoiauCR8yiNp451dmuPzhUxo84P5x3m9WJBK5kxZe
XRP
r3jYXNdMk2Vz5hXhKCKE9re8uz93JQFG1r
DOGE
DSBq5jRWkiwmEh1G7zBwmQDgRkvRr61fmb
XMR
85CTwq5wGjWZw5GgzgwZPrHyZxpLXMK5oZSSSk5j4x9w1bpqzisaWAUZYaAPfh6rP2MZJcaFqF1XmEzkw6YCqJSS2Txu6Z8




Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.