>b-but have you tried pouring sand directly into the hinge? or throwing it at a brick wall?
It failed the blowtorch test
>>110215348Wow, we got a total of (1) well-made iPhone Duo amongst a bunch of duds.
>>110215348Doubles advocate, mechanically controlled bending doesn't acount for the off centre points of force that will be applied by human operation. This is ideal, unrealistically controlled folding. But who cares? I missed the relevant threads, what was the assertion?Also had any hands on with a folding screen like this? I don't want or need a phone like this, but I mostly work from home and have my PC or laptop or big screen tv nearby. I'm not sure I get the appeal.
>>110215348>dude just use this machine that perfectly folds and unfolds the phone without any stressesdisingenuousthe sand will find its way into the hinge anyway, too
>>110215348the polish chad used free human labour to fold it and it died in 75000 foldsyikes!
>>110215348>Folds with a perfectly repeatable, exactly 90° fold in a dust and sunlight free environment>It doesnt failDo applefags really? There is fundamental flam in the hinges, you either get a screen crack once dust gets in or from the factory if pajeet feces particles got in.
>coping outside his containment thread
>>110215395What about pussy attraction?? Is there a benchmark???
>>110215482Please do not use words ending in "ussy." You have been warned.
>>110215348It's the made in India ones that are cracking. Never trust Indian Hindpoo rape rats!
>>110215348Yes, we know Samsung mastered the folding screen as they are the innovators of it. The issue is with the apple designed hinge.
>>110215435>Doubles advocatelol
>>110215348Since nobody spelled it out yet this rig is made for shilling by generating a misleading result.It does apply zero axial load and applies it the same way every time.OP is also a faggot since the post implies normal loads that differ from the rig don't exist.
>>110215348We need to let it be handled by an authentic jeet to truly determine if its reliable tech.
