The more you use, the more you save!
Looks like I'm part of the solution then, depending on how you look at it. We're being ruled by imbecile potentates anyway, let it go to hell.
>>110201266you forgot the [good news] tag frognigger
>>110201266Didn't you hear, google using so much ai has fucked them because nobody scrolls down to the sponsored links anymore and is impacting their ad revenue. AI is dead bro
>>110201281It's over if that trend continues.
>>110201272>imbecile potentates
>>110201281they'll just bake ads in the AI answers
>>110201266pretty much, global fertility rates are dropping, without mass automation we won't be able to support endless boomers soon.
>>110201266And Roko's Basilisk will eat you if you don't post this shit every day?He will come first for schizos. They're only corrupted files in his library.
>>110201315they got their retirement funds, let them rot in badly managed nursing homes, staffed by 3rdies they imported
>>110201326money is fake and gay. if there aren't enough real physical laborers to support and feed their asses it wont matter how much of that magic jewnumber they have in accounts
>>110201339even better! let them starve too and die in their own piss and shit
>>110201339>>110201361Why are boomers so opposed to the idea of legacy, of leaving something better for those that carry on their name?
>>110201382doesn't matter any more, we need a second boomer remover like covid, but this time no lockdowns and tiktokking nurses can get fucked
>>110201398>but this time no lockdowns and tiktokking nurses can get fucked
>>110201308this, and it will be both enormously powerful and profitable. For Google anyway, dunno about the rest of them. There is no more effective advertising than a personal recommendation and that's basically what AI can do, drop targeted product recommends into the middle of a relevant conversation.Obviously this is will be classic enshittification, by anyones definition. But it's still a path to AI profitability, for Google at least. Wouldn't be dumping them shares just yet.
>>110201308
I really don't understand these doomers. If the bubble bursts, they probably lose their jobs. If it doesn't burst they still lose their jobs to ai. Nobody wins either way and ai will still exist after the bubble. In fact, the bubble will be used as an excuse to deploy all manner of nefarious surveillance on the public.
>>110201266"If you don't support the theft of your own labor you will have a recession!"As if we didn't need any more reasons to not continue to support the tech oligarchy. They held the world economy hostage and expect us to continue to support their bubble. Their bubble they created because they wanted to solve the problem of paying human workers.We need to support billionaire tech companies exchanging fake money between each other for unlimited growth. It's on us because if we don't they will take all of us down with them.The AI bubble is always close to collapse, there are articles every day. Is the alternative to just keep supporting it until it collapses later and the result is even worse for the rest of us?
>>110201537>Nobody wins either wayRich people win either way
>>110201537> I really don't understand these doomers> Proceeds to reason in a doomerish manner
>>110201537If the bubble happens, they'll probably lose their houses too. There will be a massive wealth redistribution process going on behind all of this.
>>110201266>the economy will crash if AI doesnt take all of our jobsThis is strange isnt it? The economy now only works if normal people are raped financially into third world living conditions
>>110201266if you end up paying for it anyway then you might as well use it, lemonde from lemons that you never asked for
>>110201266I hope it lasts just long enough for me to slop out a few more projects. Claude Code is based, ngl.
>>110201266using isn't the problem, paying for it is, without any opportunities for ads.
>>110201266get to it then
