I thought they were back in the game with their new line of energy efficient chips..?
>Intel down 20%>amzn down 5%>fucking sprouts down 25%strange day.
>>110197632google down 13% too
>>110197632google lost half a trillyroblox and reddit also lost which is funnyreddit in particular said their users grew but it was all international (read: indians)glad to know even investors are wising up to the poop menace
we shouldn’t care about oligarchfinance>muh retirement
>>110197661All that growth is from bot farms running in turd world.
>>110197570I’m on my third replacement 14900K.All three have started to degrade within a year.I have one more year left on my original warranty and I bet this one is going to fry itself by then.Intel has given me 2 free CPUs and I expect at least 1 more. 13th and 14th gen Intel CPU warranties must still be costing them
datacenter business up nearly 2x and they have more demand they can't meetpc market is fucked because of memoryso things are going to get worse as they try and shift as much of their capacity away from consumer cpusmemory boomers (and gas turbine boomers) are fucking everyone right now
>>110197570You don't understand, goy! We need MORE AI!
Ok best stocks to buy rn?
>>110197951See this post, Coreweave? Why are you down over 46% over the last 6 months? Anon posted this. Read it and do better.
>>110198068you should really think about the things you're writing before you hit post, anon
>>110197632>>110197658retail is divesting in preparation for ANT IPO
>>110197570Good riddance, get rekt AI shills.The collapse can't come soon enough.
>>110198136does it make sense to move money from data center and chip makers tho?
>>110197570tinfoil hat on:>LGA1954 will be the last x86 consumer socket from Intel>Intels will move it's "Core" branded CPU's to ARM64>Intel, Nvidia, Apple, Qualcomm, AMD, and other tech giants will form an alliance and hold close to 50% (if not more) of ARM by the end of the 2030s
>>110197570Cant use the CPU if there's no ram.
>>110197570Intel is literally runned by retards. They sold their memory division right before AI
>>110198197>does it make sense to move money from data center and chip makers tho?where else are you going to get money? everything else is oversold because the world has been throwing all of its capital into muh aihow the fuck are cheerios at a 20 year low
>>110198205>>Intels will move it's "Core" branded CPU's to ARM64nah that's too much
>>110199073FUCK CHEERIOS!
>>110198384>runnedwho is the retard here
>>110198384>runnedThey're at least not as retarded as you thougheverbeit.
if you had an i286 CPU, some metal dust, wires, a blender, and a stun gun, and arranged it in a way where the dust and wires were in the blender spinning around at full speed and the CPU was stuck to the top of the blender, and a stun gun was constantly giving a current to the dust somehow, do you think it is possible that the CPU could ever turn on and run a copy of windows 95? which is more likely, the cpu virtually running windows 95 or it spontaneously turning into a black hole. you have INFINITE amount of time to run the experiment
>>110197661>reddit also lost which is funnyThey announced that the site access is going account-only. It's advertising suicide.
>>110197744>I’m on my third replacement 14900Ksounds like you're killing them on purpose or you've significant overvolted. At some point you have to realize it's a YOU problem
>>110200079The stun gun is too high voltage and too low current. A cpu needs 1.5v (and others) but at like 50A.A stun gun is like 40000v and 0.0001A.The electricity from a stun gun will just go straight through a CPU and never activate its functions.I assume you are implying that metal dust and wires in a totally random, constantly changing configuration could randomly make electrical connections to the CPU such that it is loading and reading data.But this is not possible because a blender is too slow. i286 is way too old to be running windows 95 anyway but it's still a 4+Mhz CPU. That's 4 million cycles per second but even fast blenders are only in the 5000 rotations per second range.
>>110197632>>110197658The AI bubble is popping. Its not strange.Coreweave which is like the front runner of taking debt and making gpu datacenters for AI is now near junk credit ratings and is at -50%.Googles profit in the past year has been fake, more than half YTD is all unrealized gains on anthropic stock that they can't sell. Borderline fraud. Amazon is the same, as in massive anthropic holding but they didnt report it as revenue in the same way so less scammy.Intel, AMD and NVDA, and all the chip stocks will go down a lot because their valuations are so high because of the AI bubble even though they are making actual profit selling shovels in the gold rush.While AI is down and the SP500 and world market with it is down, money is moving to real companies that make real products that make money and have all along. The world is healing.
>>110200239no it isnt popping at all, this is called a correctionthe stock market is not zero sum, for people buying long or short, at some point they have to sell. thats the only way to make money. stocks going down means people are liquidating, making money. in a collapse yes people lose money but anthropic and openai havent ipo'd, they are still in the game. >money is moving to real companies that make real products that make money and have all along. The world is healing.whatever headcannon you have is wrong, the stock market is like a pipe, and profit is the pressure of water in that pipe. if everyone trickles out a little bit of water at a time, the pressure never builds up. but if people wait for pressure to build and get in on the race to sell first, the amount of profit to be made is much more. You think the pipe has exploded, but you dont realize is that its a built in offramp for profits.
>>110200152a system that is constantly changing state will never simulate anythingalso youd probably need that high voltage to get any current flow at all with so much air and spinning shit, you are genuinely braindead
>>110200276>no it isnt popping at all, this is called a correctionWe'll see about that.>for people buying long or short, at some point they have to sellNo. Borrowing against stocks for liquidity has been standard practice for a long time now. I myself have a credit line on my investment account that's way more than my yearly earnings and about as big as my total savings. You only need to take profits if there is a significant risk of losing money by holding. You are literally never supposed to sell, that should only be done by whoever manages your estate when you die.>the stock market is like a pipe, and profit is the pressure of water in that pipe. if everyone trickles out a little bit of water at a time, the pressure never builds up. but if people wait for pressure to build and get in on the race to sell first, the amount of profit to be made is much more.Im not talking about profit gained from appreciation of stocks. Im talking about actual, real profits that companies earn and can pay out as dividends. Stock prices are just emotional predictions of the future, they can be totally irrational, based on imagined future profits that may never happen. Real earnings paid out as dividends are the only connection to reality that stocks have. A company that doesn't make money can have any price the market imagines, but a company that consistently pays dividends can never go too low, if pepsi crashed to $1.3 now then you would be getting a 400% return per year even if price never recovered. This is what the whole market is predicting into the future.>but you dont realize is that its a built in offramp for profits.>Anthropic and openAI havent IPOd yetThis is very much connected. OpenAI is in too bad shape to IPO but anthropic might manage to shift the bag to the public. Yes it's a profit off-ramp for insiders, but that is admitting that the bubble will pop.
>>110197570Intel will win in the endt. me
>>110200339>a system that is constantly changing state will never simulate anythingWhile its totally hypothetical, ignoring the technical issues like the voltage being right it will, but only for a short time. Just like if I run a program to generate random strings eventually one of them will be "a system that is constantly changing state will never simulate anything".>also youd probably need that high voltage to get any current flow at all with so much air and spinning shitI never said that you didn't. But it's not compatible with CPUs. They need low voltages because the gaps inside them between conductive parts are so small.
>>110197570They should consider starting a bombing run on Dario and Sam Altman personal mansions to make RAM cheaper.
>>110200276>thats the only way to make moneyno, high finance is way more complicated than thatbut the fancy routes to making money can also make you lose a lot more
>>110200151i paid for a 6ghz CPU
>>110200276don't overdose on copium there bud
>>110198055Intel. Buy low, sell high.
>>110197570>>110197632it's POPPIN' baby!
>>110197570you need ram to use intel cpuram is overpriced so people dont buypeople dont buy so intel doesnt make moneyhope this helps
>>110197570Great, they have new energy efficient chips.Now if only we could afford the computers they're in.
>>110197570RAM and Storage makes them stupidly expensive, so nobody is buying.Apple can afford to be cheaper because they have huge purchasing power and have few models to produce, meanwhile on the PC side, everyone needs their own separate cut and that shit adds up. It's why buying a prebuilt is actually cheaper than building your own desktop.
>>110197744Get a 12th gen CPU, both 13th and 14th are completely borked. 12th gen is socket-compatible.
>>110200151It's a very well known problem. They tried 50 fixes with firmware, half of them borked the chips even harder. Some people have found that significantly undervolting the CPU works, but for others it doesn't.
>>110204958It was a very well-known problem. Past tense.If you are still getting new ones and frying them within months, you need to seriously consider the fact that your motherboard might be the culprit.
>>110197632every friday the tech stocks take a beating after investors look at their profiles see tech hasn't jumped up 200 trillion and start to panicafter a weekend away doing coke on yachts they'll be back with new belief in the tech stocks
>>110205025Pretty much this. Everything will be back to green by Monday
>>110205015The issue was never fixed. Intel just put it under the rug and pretended otherwise with every firmware update they pushed then gave up.
>>110202224how are dell and HP selling PCs without ram?
>>110200151Intel kills them from the factory by overvolting it to get to 6 niggahertz, there's a reason CPU frequency stagnated
>>110205177It was fixed. Most people stopped having that problem after the firmware updates fixed the voltage issues, this of course doesn't help anything if your motherboard is still oversupplying power.
>>110197570>with their new line of energy efficient chips..Except you can't find a new x7 14" laptop without a million gimmicks or in that XPS for $3000.
>>110205025>>110205071Just a reminder, gents. The nasdaq averaged only ~2.5% losses per month, just over ~2.5 years, in the dotcom bubble pop.
AMDGODS won
>>110207809But the AI investing is going into its fourth year already.
>>110200464How?
>>110207762No. Intel abandoned the issue after claiming it to be fixed 4 times in a row and never fixing it. They never fixed it, they just pretended they did.
