We need more e-cores and we desperately NEED to send billions to israel

what is /g/'s problem with e-cores?
I'd rather have 24 e-cores than 6 p-cores.

>>110192553
can you fuckers let go of this bloated and ancient architecture already?

>>110192666
Nice trips, it's a feeling of loss from people clinging to desktops. Power is cheaper than ever and they're going efficient instead of more powerful. I prefer e cores for battery life. Maybe one day I'll leave my Mac in the sun and never have it run out.

>>110192553
holy SMOKES
those ewaste laptops are going to be HELLA fast in 2028 or whatever

>>110192553
>dualcore laptops
thank you intel sirs i can run my Ubuntu fast best regards from Bangalore

>>110192553
>BASE POWER 15W
probably at 700MHz base clock
and BOOST POWER 125W

This is just the replacement for whatever is the codename for those low power N300, N100, J4125, etc chips. They don't compete with the 125W ryzens or even any laptop chips (of which AMD barely has any; I mean they have a portfolio but they have like 1-2 design wins), they are used in shit like SBCs or kiosks or industrial SoCs boards.

They are also pretty cool outside of the bare minimum connectivity; you can run them at something like 3-4W idle which is awesome for a 24/7 on mini server and such.