Chat, how cooked are we?
I get 56
>>110177878Speedo meter?
>>110177878we on a livestream???
>>110177878I am pretty fast.
is this bad?
If only you knew how bad things really are
hang in there x86 bros...
>>110177878What's a spee dom meter? Does it meter how dominant a spee is? What the fuck is a spee?
>>110178614ttpo, it's pedo meter, shows your cp level
>>110178665>OP not a pedoThis thing must be broken.
>>110178691anything above 0 = pedo, the guise with 10x are super pedators
>>110177878Helium and Edge both give me about the same results
>>110178714Post yours
>>110177878on ungoogled chromium
>>110178796it's over 9000
snailcatting to the extremezoooooooooom
Since OP didn't bother:https://browserbench.org/Speedometer3.1/
>>110178075Anything under 10 is bad.15-20 is average30 is good40 is very good50 is excellent70+ is apple machine
OP must be phoneposting from a landline, phonepoasting from my shitty xiaomi from 2018 rn
>>110179792nah i was using a n2807
>>110178075Same score. Does anyone know how to make that over 50 points?
>>110179808Get a Macbook
Chrome is the fastest of the three browsers I use on my phone and I never use it.
>>110178902Nie może być...
>>110178032what device? seems very high given the results I get on a couple different devices
>>110177878posting on 4chon from LHC supercomputer @CERN
>>110183158get fucked poorfag
that's what a 5yo PC (5950x) and FF get you
>>110182101m6 mini
>>110179284>11.4, a poor score apparently.>Everything went by quite quickly, easily quick enough that I usually couldn't finish reading what was being displayed.What a stupid benchmark. I don't browse the web competitively and I doubt anyone has their brains running at 10terahertz to keep up with this. That score on a machine that can smoothly edit 4K video in Resolve and play 4K youtube without any drops.
<-- i7-4790 non-k (12 years old)my phone with a 4 year old snapdragon 695 gets 6.7I really don't know how macs get these stupid high scores in the 70s when macOS animations make them feel dogshit slow
>>110177878Some of the things it did in the benchmark were just blank and some didn't seem to even load, and it seems to have been raped by some of my click2load filters.Stripped down FF + Betterfox + strict uBO on a 9800X3D/5080/64GB.
>>110185376neat, looking forward to the M6 Max Mac Studio whenever they release that
>>110177878WTF are you running this on?I get 1.01 on a Core2Duo from 2009 running Pale Moon with 750 tabs open.
Athlon X4 750K running Windows 10 and using Edge6.97 with extensions7.86 without extensionsOnePlus Nord N200 running Android 14 and using Edge Mobile4.588
>>110185424It's used to compare browser performance in the same machine, it's not an actual benchmark
It's actually over.
>>110179284Sadge, 9.3But then again, only AMP crashes my browser and I keep at most 4 tabs open
>>110187663>i7-4790Interesting. I get this with my i5-4670 in Brave (Firefox is slightly lower at 13.9).
>>110192895is this with plugins disabled?i have these installed and don't feel like removing them desu
>>110177878This benchmark is shit, it only exists to create the impression that Macs are the best devices in the world
>>110195440intel macs don't do well in browser benchmarksapple silicon is just that good
my same chip is now 10% faster than when i bought itthank you google for optimizing chromium or whatever
This is still my primary machine. FF 115 ESR
>>110177878My phone (S26 Ultra) :^)
