is it cringe for someone pushing 30 to dress with baggy clothes, zoomer-like
>>18769228yes
>>18769232even like this?
>>18769228This had better be bait. We invented it, you little bastard
>>18769228it's not, it's a perfect illustration of the end of baggy clothes
>>18769228Yes
>>18769235Thats fine
>>18769237uncos:skull:
Ok so what urban outfits would you recommend for someone pushing 30? I'm slim and 177cm tall
>>18769237>WeNah, bruh. That was my generation and I'm a 40 year old unc.
>>18769253basedhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGAatCB4KCwhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w1A_Olic4uw
>>18769235especially like thatbarrel jeans are cringe on anybody
>>18769253no you didn't, it was gen x that showed you what cool is
>>18769228>baggy clothesYou misunderstood what I said in the other thread. I was talking about the skater look. Not that you can't were wide pants. Just wear wide cut wool trousers or something. It's the baggy pants sneake tshirt combo that looks retarded in you at that age. If you still have a full head of hair and Norwood 1, then you can probably pull it longer. But once the receding hairline becomes noticeable the style simply looks silly.
>>18769370wtf is a skater look anyway? in 2016 it was spray on jeans, a thrasher shirt and flannel.
>>18769372Like this. Though the pants are kinda tame in this fit.
>>18769375this is more of a wigga look with that crisp white tee and the knockoff af1s. a skater outfit should look more edgy.
>>18769376Yea that's fine. You get the idea though. Skinny jeans are similarly bad. Every time I see some 40+ year old guy in sneakers and skinny jeans I die a little inside. It just looks ridiculous.
>>18769379the definition of a skinny cut shifts. 10 years ago it was literally jeggings. i liked how in the late 2000s skinny jeans were more cigarette shaped, what was later considered slim, but quite because later slim jeans started becoming more of an "athletic cut" to fit fatasses.
>>18769228yes.>>18769235a bit less, but still tryhard unless you work in something media related.>>18769379they look bad because they went out of style, most old people (I'm one of them) never update their styles beyond what they wore during their 20s/30s. You can wear mostly anything at any age if you're skinny enough, which most people past their late 20s are not. You will then look like an edgy old man, but won't look objectively bad, just like a retard.You can extrapolate this concept to women as well. A very fit milf can wear teenager clothes and look good. People around her will think she's a whore and going through middle life crisis (and they would probably be right), but still drool over how she looks.
>>18769384Yea perhaps skinny is the wrong term since what I am referring to predominantly are jeans too tight for the person who wears them. It's probably a tapered cut more often then not, that wouldn't even be skinny on someone who is skinny. The point more so is that there are infinite styles one can wear, and some simply look better than some worse on certain age groups. And if one is seriously interested in fashion then imo one should also come to simply accept that. The same way one has to come to accept that certain colors simply don't work with one's skin tone. If you ignore this and simply dress however, then one isn't even really into fashion, one simply dresses without concern for aesthetic cohesion. And someone like that is just as bad as someone who doesn't care.
>>18769392middle aged men no matter what they look like want to wear the trendy clothes, but will only convert toward the end of the cycle when it's considered safe enough. kinda like how some laggards were still wearing bootcut jeans in the 2010s. obviously with women its different, they will try out the new thing as soon as it goes on sale.
>>18769228Do the fuck you want and fuck what everyone is thinking
>>18769368They're 40 now, stupid indian
>>18769375I saw a millenial dress like this, he had a grey beard and shit.I physically cringed.
>>18769408How's it going fellow young kids?! Glad I can appreciate countless different style so I can simply pick one that suits my current age/appearance. I am honestly confused these people don't change their style more often. They only buy cheap made in Bangladesh fast fashion shit anyway. Perfect to reinvent oneself.
>>18769235Why are they pushing cropped with low rise it looks like such horrific shit
>>18769253I'm 33 and lived through both. Skinny jeans weren't cool until junior year of HS and middle school was all baggy skateboard brands and huge globe and etnies and dc shoes. Then, suddenly, it was all 510s and 511s. I'm on the younger of the millenial scale as well.
>>18769375I hate the cropped shirts so much. I blame the koreans. They're doing it because asians have insanely long torsos and short legs, this doesn't work with normal people. It's even worse on blacks who have short torsos and long legs
>>18769375I hate this type of fit its so ugly
jeans should fit like this
>>18769228Zoomers “baggy” fashion is literally DERIVED from adult’s (30-80yo) fashion of pre-2000 decades. Zoomers are completely retarded when they think that’s “their thing”.
>>18769228You're asking aging /pol/tards who do not socialize in real life about what's acceptable in clothing?
it's not. if you're in nyc no ones gonna bat an eye to someone dressing in today's baggy look, as long as you're actually doing it right. ignore these flyover state npcs with main character syndrome
>>18769228>is it cringe for a 30 year old to dress like a middle schooler?the fact that you even have to ask tells me that there's no hope for you
>>18769235Thats like mid 20s shit
>>18769237Gen X invented it, millennials were just the consumers. In fact in the 2010s millennials popularized skinny jeans because they saw the baggy 90s/2000s fits as trashy and tacky
>>18769375This looks good at any age if you’re jacked. It will look like you’re trying to be hard to be a twink if you’re skinnyfat etc
>>18770212Pretty sure it was much more complicated than that lol. Skinny jeans were popularized in part cause gym culture started kicking off and there's nothing better at highlighting vtaper than skinny legs and deep vnecks.
>>18769408how should a millenial dress then? If you dress like ryan gosling you just look like you work in sales.
>>18770218theres nothing better at signaling you're Indian/Venezuelan/eurotrash than that
>>18769372skaters wear whatever is fashionable. in the 70s it was bellbottoms and long hair, in the 80s it was acid wash and graphic tees, in the 90s it was baggy cholo/gangsta shit, and so on.
>>18770262This style got popular at a time when you didn't even know India existed, zoom zoom.
>>18769228once you get into your 30s you shouldn't give a single shit about appearing young
>>18770288who the fuck cares? if you dressed like a medieval peasant you'd also look ridiculous, the past is in the past and the current associations are completely different, moron
>>18769228fine if it's casual>>18769235this is not ok for any age
>>18769228depends on how old you look, how much hair you still have, etc
>>18771605this, i'm 32 but look 23 and skinny af so no one bats an eye
>>18769228Nah. I'm pushing 50 and been dressing like that for the past 35 years.
>>18774296Nahhhh nahhh unless them tall tees shrunk nobody wore too short tees
I wonder what you guys think about https://www.bershka.com/
>>18769228nope
>>18774354They were always youth oriented but they pushed too far into this niche of being only ultrahip zoomer fake thrifted y2k shit.They're just Zara in terms of quality, I regularly browse their stuff and have some t-shirts. I like their collab stuff like the Toyota shirts they recently put out. The only expensive thing they sell is ironically the only thing I want, their socks, which are 8 euro for a pair of Gengar socks that are mostly poly, insane.>>1876922840 and I wear loose clothes occasionally, loose pants although not to that extent, and I look super cool.
>>18774744>They're just Zara in terms of qualityWho cares, it will be out of style within 5 years. There's zero reason to spend real money on trend clothes. Zara is the solution to trends. Nobody is going to want their baggy ass shit and too short baggy tee shirts in 5 years. The only reason too short shirts are in style is because koreans have insanely long torsos compared to their legs and it actually helps them look more proportional.
>>18774757I just meant it's as good as Zara despite being positioned to be cheaper in the inditex group
>>18769931looks like american boomer seinfeld shit>absolute shit
>>18769235canadian tuxedos still are and always will be embarrassing
>>18769237>>18770212no one alive today invented it ya mugs
I'm pushing 30... are my jeans too baggy bros?
>>18769237>>18775560
>>18770395You would look ridiculous, I would not.
>>18769228if someone can cut their dick off and wear a dress with a 5 o clock shadow, uncs can wear baggies. do what you want to do
>>18769228>>18777562The question was not "Can I physically do this?" it was "Will I look like a retard having an early mid-life crisis?" to which the answer is yes.If you are 25+ and have not found your niche, I would say that it is time to stop following trends and just having clothes that fit you and maybe some cool jackets, especially at 30.>>18777421Good example. And no your jeans fit your body type.
>>18777564im saying that if he has the confidence to wear em, he should look fine as long as he isn't pretending to look younger than he is. baggies can look like total slacker wear or look somewhat chic across ages depending on what they are paired with. it ain't that difficult to style. just get a complimentary shirt. you can find a million fit inspo pics on pinterest
>>18769407Nta but gen x are much older than 40.
>>18769228Yes. When you’re 30 it’s expected that you either dress like a professional or some kids dad.
>>18769370>>18769375Am I still allowed to rock the skater look if I’m 31 but can still switch tre flip?
>>18769228Don't do it zoomer styleDo it adult style with medium-high waist trousers with a "relaxed" or loose fit and a loose Tee tucked in with a leather belt.
>>18777850I seriously hope you guys don't do this
>>18769228nodress however you want unc
>>18777421you look like a skinnyfatoid but the jeans are fine
>>18777850I'm not wasting my time ironing that shit every day
>>18777993You dont have to iron anything in that fit though? You retarded or something?
>>18777995the pants, moran
>>18777999Just fold it after you take it out of the dryer? I've never had to iron any of my pants even my wool ones
>>18778010doubtpost a photo of the pants thenthe chocolate gentleman's pants have no visible creases
>>18778012I'm at work right now but the pants I'm wearing I've never ironed
>>18778029ok I believe you now and I offer my concession
>>18778032I mean I guess it depends on the fabricMaybe you'd have to iron linen pants or some shit
>>18777993hang your clothes like an adult who the fuck needs to iron shit anymore?
>>18769953Zoomer baggy fashion is a bastardization of the 90s oversized style. What zoomers wear is more like the female version of it. Crop tops and pants that are often literally women's jeans and pantsuit pants they grabbed from the women's section. Zoomer baggy pants are not how men's baggy pants are cut/fit. They're designed more for women's hips and thighs.
>>18778395i remember emo/hardcore kids buying skinny womens jeans
its cringe when youngniggers do it already so even moreso as an oldcel
>>1876922840% of young people in Osaka dress like this
I wear baggy pants because I stole 5 pairs of work cargos from my old job and love the fit. I also am not obsessed with what other people think and just like what I like. You fuckers need to fix your fucking heads.
>>18777421Pants arent doing the fit justice, it makes it look basic as fuckArc jacket with the yellowed sole Stan smiths go hard as fuck but I was going to tell you, you need some diors or some shit but securing a pair in your size might be unobtainium I would definitely look into getting a pair of high quality jeans, maybe some Rick or some shit since you’re obviously okay with shelling out high 3 figures for clothes hence the dead bird on your chest
>>18778762He was going to look like a basic bitch illegal immigrant regardless of which pants he wore because of that low class jacket and sneakers.
>>18777421Arc'teryx (owned by Lululemon lmao) plastic cringe. This is terrible.
>>18770218this dude unironically thinks SEXcore started and popularized skinnys instead of all the pbr sipping, fixie riding, wayfarer wearing, passion pit listing, macbook djing williamsburg hipster TRASH LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOoOOOooooo
>>18770395>past bad present gudFucking retard. Medieval people dressed much better than modern degenerate fags like you.
>>18778834Skinny jeans were en Vogue during the early to mid 2000s already, Raj. The shit you list here was hardly even relevant until the 10s. MacBooks only took off once they switched to the unibody casing, which happened in like 2009.
>>18778842random myspace spottings of scene twinks doesnt mean it was trendy. hedi slimane’s slp collections (i bet you felt so smart dropping ‘en vogue’ because of this fag) just happened coincide with the rival of skinnys and had zero influence on its general mass adoption. but returning to the main post, its a fact SEXcore and swagfags were the peak saturation of the skinny trend, whereas 2007 hipsters were basically the middle ground where wider perception of skinny jeans were on split on it being faggy but stylish and it grew from there. by 2016 everyone thought skinny/slim taper fit would never fall off like manbuns but trashy people always ruin the perception of outfits because we are innately classist. raj couldve search assisted you better than your AI poisoned query you dirty ass pinterest filipino
>>18778860You're the only one using the term sexcore, you smelly jeet. And why the fuck do you even feel like associating skinny jeans with fucking YSL of all brands? Apparently you had never been to a Dior Homme store during the 00s. It was nothing but skinny jeans. Just because sinny jeans weren't as big during the 00s as they would become doesn't mean that they weren't trendy and widely worn already. Mostly among emos and gymrats who skipped leg day like it was a sacrilege to do squats. Perhaps not in your village, but I wouldn't know what they wore in New Delhi.
>>18778860>>18778865They’re SLIM STRAIGHT not SKINNY Hot topic was literally the only place to get skin tight jeans because all the scene musicians wore that shitLiterally nobody was wearing Dior until Covid, you people are trying to retcon the selvedge APC era with the Uniqlo striped shirt and cdg chucks I was there!
Nigga really said Dior homme store man what the fuck Nah point me to the Dior Dior store because I be up in all the stores Man y’all gotta fucking die for real posting all this bullshit on the fucking internet
>>18778867>Literally nobody was wearing Dior until CovidKek, the hell are you on about? Are you fucking nuts? I still have like a half a dozen pairs from 2008ish alone. And yes, they were sold at Dior stores for men's wear exlusively, usually in malls like Lafayette and the likes. COVID lmao, ok zoomzoom.
bro must think incest was trendy before inbred pakis took over his little township because his uncle diddled him too
The New Delhi Paki thinks he has a grasp on anything despite living in some SEA slum and not having lived in a developed civilization for more than 10 years lmao. Dior since COVID, I CAN'T. Tiktok zoomers lmao
>>18769228Lol I got these pants in uniqlo on a whim yesterday because I like the corduroy and colour. But I don't want zoomers to laugh at/stab me
>>18778904Ngl I loathe big checkered shirts cause they look like tablecloth but I really like the colors and textures here. Not a fan of the shoes, but no clue of alternatives either. Albeit could never wear this myself since I'd go fucking crazy from the heat. That's 4 layers isn't it?
>>18778911Thanks man I honestly usually hate these kind of shirts too, the style of pattern just tends to ruin outfits but for whatever reason this particular one I actually find goes with quite a lot and actually looks nice I struggle to know what kind of shoes to wear with something so baggy, I can only think of chunky trainers
>>18778869Congratulations?08, Lmaooo, so what, just to flex how you were top 1% on MySpace or some shit?So you would know that back then, only actors and david Beckham were photographed with their stacked Dior jeans. Not even musicians were on that shit back then either LOLBut good for you getting to shop at name brand stores, being :in the know:It’s quite ironic how it’s tailored for men but they don’t mention being emasculated and emaciated to fit comfortably in themI’m not even a zoomer and it’s a shame to share a generation with your kind
Only you pretentious internet pricks would impose how empowered you are over your name brand fabrics worn in excess Go find me some Dior fit pics but don’t show me anything from the paparazzi or a catalog That indie sleeze era you fags try to larp and copy as is all American apparel mall core shitThis name brand logo mania retail bullshit is all just to compensate on instagram, people never cared about the designer until recently, it was all about branding
>>18778869>>18779185It was fucking Hedi Slimane you fucking nerds. He was at Dior during the early 2000s and pushed Skinny jeans like a faggot then he joined YSL in 2012 and again did Skinny jeans nonstop like a faggot until they finally fell off in 2016~ when everyone started getting into scoop tshirts and joggers and evenutally athleisure. We faggots ate up skinny jeans whenever Hedi was designing them at whichever label he was at, first when he was at Dior and later when he was at YSL, his shit was always posted nonstop during those years.
>>18769228>baggy clothes, zoomer-likeno one owns anything. you can in fact wear anything you want
>>18778904thats not even baggy thats just relaxed
>>18769237>unc lmao ts can't be real
>>18769228I think a little-big fit is better. Like a baggy shirt and tight pants or vice versa.Like the Samurai tradition of Daisho, carrying a long sword and a short sword.
>>18769228Yes, but it is not age specific
>>18769228zoomer chain on anyone over 16 is giga cringe yea
>>18769228>is it cringe for someone pushing 30 to dress with baggy clothes, zoomer-likeyes nigga. You are past that age. That's why there's memes of older "performative males" that dress like this and drink matcha trying to hook girls in college coffee shops. Its time to dress your age. Atleast try fits like The Row if you want something current.
>>18780662>the rowlmao nice fat balding jew core bruh
>>18780666the superior post-modern design of The Row terrifies and makes self-conscious the satanic retard
>>18780668>those shitty wrinkles from poor patterningkek might as well wear zara
I just wana look sorta modern even if Im unc. so not baggy but not unc regular eitherand alsofuck old money style which is usually recommended around here, I dont wanna wear fucking polos, blazers and loafers like Im at some tea party or late brunchI just want to look crisp and modern without the fag shit. Maybe its time to be grunge again. Flare jeans, steel toe boots and flannel overshirts
>>18781036>grunge again. Flare jeansflare jeans are not grunge
>>18781036>I just wana look sorta modern even if Im uncthe meta now is clean, traditional clothing with muted colors.>but not unc regular eitheryeah but you say shit like>Maybe its time to be grunge againthat shit is unc. No one cares for old look like that. You don't have to look like old money to be clean. They key is sizing and colors
>>18781129>> sandals with socksfacepalm.gifthats not unc, thats gramps teritoryand youre talking about whats meta
>>18781129Love the style (shoes are shit) but can't look like this cause I work out too much and have too much fun doing sports. It's kinda sad how most of this stuff is designed around little zombies. The Row models tend to be nothing but skin and bones a small breeze would blow away. Thinner arms than 4 year old girls. It's kinda pathetic, ngl.
>>18775560none of these retards you posted invented itthe garment is an Ottoman Salvar
>>18781447I doubt that having muscle would make that fit not work, anon, just get the right sizesUnless you're absurdly built I find it hard to believe this baggy traditional bullshit wouldn't work lmao
>>18783195No that's not what I meant. I wear The Row, but it doesn't look as good on me because my arm aren't tooth picks and my chest isn't flat. Which makes their silk shirts drape and fall not as nicely as they do in the promo material. So the shirt looks better on the model than it does on me, but I would never wanna look like the model. It's a bit of a conundrum.
Yeah, same boat as OP. 34 year oldI live in a hot place and have low tolerance for it, so I wear shorts a lot. Not easy to make them work without feeling like I'm dressing too young.
i mean im 26 and a zoomer. sill dressing baggy tho ive been experimenting with flared jeans recently
Feel bad for the big pants bros sometimes, they staked so much on this look and it's already over, all I can say to millenial and older zoomer friends is, don't try to chase this trend now, jumping on a bad trend after it has passed is what will out you as aged, aside from your thinning hair and crows feet I mean.
>>18785975>aside from your thinning hair and crows feet
>>18769372they dress like Johnny Knoxville now in more fashionable areas
>>18779188dubs
>>18769228I never liked the baggy pants look on men. You rarely see anyone attractive trying to pull it off, just fatties trying to hide. Oversized shirt on skinny fit pants is the ideal
