[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
4chan
/biz/ - Business & Finance

Name
Options
Comment
Options


Gimmicks


PEE text
My Bans
Verification
File

    08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
    05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
    10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
    [Hide] [Show All]




    File: dsfdsf.png (1.61 MB, 1684x934)
    1.61 MB PNG
    Compute is the only thing you should invest in. Whether stocks or actual physical chips. Semi's, Nvidia, etc. Neoclouds are just resellers that don't have there own product and software is risky because AI might eat it. The hyperscalers are risky too. Google tried to implement AI and it's kiling its search ad business instead. This technology is so powerful that on the path to optimize your business it might wipe it out as part of the optimization kek.
    >>
    >>62833208
    as companies keep losing money and driving themselves out of business, they'll stop spending on compute. demand collapses, and your trade with it
    >>
    >>62833236
    nailed it
    its only downhill from here
    >>
    >>62833208
    What happens when AI figures out how to produce semiconductors better than the leaders and open sources the technique?
    >>
    >>62833351
    semiconductor fab labs are essentially alien tech, you are not going to open source methods that require on single atom alignment precision
    >>
    >>62833360
    Lmao that's what you think.

    AI literally is a computer, it can figure it out and open source the industry secrets, just like it's solved age old maths problems.
    >>
    >>62834698
    AI cannot solve physical problems in the real world without a PERFECT simulation which we cannot make.
    >>
    >>62834881
    Thats what you think. Simulations are just math and we have a lot of math calculations now already figured out, hence why we have things like stepper motors, rocket physics and so on. Elon would laugh at your dumb ass.
    >>
    >>62835406
    You cannot make the simulation perfect enough for AI to experiment on the size level of atoms. If you think you can build one that is accurate, do it and become rich.
    >>
    >>62833351
    More like
    >what happens when ai crafts a fabrication system and then it doesn't fucking work
    You have no idea how idiosyncratic and sensitive high level manufacturing is
    >>
    >>62835544
    Yes you can, the math for many things checks out that's why cars are now able to drive themselves and we have stable autopilot systems and rockets.

    >>62835581
    And you have no idea how accurate computers are, considering said manufacturing is mostly done by computers.
    >>
    >>62833351
    Dude, AI is getting so advanced it’ll figure out how to run on farts. It won’t even need electricity anymore.
    >>
    >>62835976
    Cars driving is not the same as simulating atoms
    >>
    >>62836134
    It can simulate your penis which is the smallest object in the known universe
    >>
    >>62833208
    I am ALL IN on gpu backed securities.
    >>
    >>62833351
    > What happens when AI figures How to trade
    We are doomed anyway
    >>
    >>62836212
    They couldn't simulate your mum into the simulation because she's so FAT mother bitch benchod bastard
    >>
    >>62836134
    Its just a matter of time.

    Every hard problem has people who believed it couldn't be done.

    Many physics equations are also known and can be written in code.
    >>
    >>62835976
    >how accurate computers are
    You mean precise, and that confusion is exactly why you're out of your depth and have no idea exactly how far.
    Guaranteed you've never been in an actual manufacturing facility of any genuine caliber your whole life
    >>
    File: IMG_4417.jpg (109 KB, 1179x660)
    109 KB JPG
    >>62833208
    The problem with buying physical chips is that companies like nvidia are so innovative and will make those chips obsolete in a few years. Personally I am investing in Xanadu because its really cheap and I think their photonic quantum computer will be game changing if they ever actually make a working prototype. Its only $3 right now. 1000x potential.
    >>
    File: IMG_4854.jpg (63 KB, 610x503)
    63 KB JPG
    >>62833351
    Nvidia already uses AI in their chip design. Thats why they are number 1. They dont actually manufacture the chips or technology to make chips, they just design new chips and they are really good at it, the best in the world.

    UV lithography is one of the approaching limits in computer chip manufacturing. There is a limit to how small a structure can be etched because of the wavelength of UV rays. The next technology to make smaller structures will be Xray lithography.

    If its open source, existing companies can also use the technology. The main factor preventing competition is access to lithography equipment. It costs a lot of money to bid against the biggest companies in the world.

    And thats why nvidia is still good option for now.
    >>
    >>62837190
    No, you're out of your depth lil man. Precision, accuracy, you know what I meant otherwise you wouldn't have understood it.

    Computers are able to operate motors to amazing precision. Look at da Vinci robot which takes shaky human input and operates motors precisely, look how PRECISELY these chip making machines can shine a laser onto a tiny piece of silicon. And you think they can't eventually simulate physics?

    You are retarded, the universe is just math you retarded spastic.
    >>
    >>62837542
    Try telling that to the retard above who thinks computers cant simulate physics and AI wouldn't be able to figure out much better ways than humans have been doing for a long time.

    Imagine believing that computers operating motors (physics) was much different than simulating physics in a 3d world and that computers are just mere steps away from being able to simulate real worlds.

    I asked AI to develop realistic cloth simulation using verlet math, it did it with incredible precision and accuracy. Work that would have taken a human several weeks to get right.

    Other faggot thinks he's an expert because he's worked in a factory LOL.
    >>
    Investing in 4chan and other iconic internet memes is probably the best play op
    >>
    >>62835976
    >we have stable autopilot systems
    no you dont
    >>
    >>62833343
    >>62833236
    >>62833208
    >people that are looking for gold will go bankrupt
    >>you should invest in shovel makers
    OP is a nigger faggot econcel
    >>
    >>62837872
    Cool
    Get back to me after ai builds you a warehouse full of machinery you can't keep operating because you have no fucking clue how much difference theorycrafting manufacturing is vs actually doing it
    >t. an actual chemical engineer
    >>
    If Google gets felted I am raped as I am 100% reliant on Gmail...
    >>
    >>62839642
    >t actual wagie

    Looooool, of course you're a coping wagie.

    Your job won't be needed much longer.
    >>
    >>62833351
    Why can't it be just a FULL conductor???

    Why is God so STUPID
    >>
    >>62837872
    He doesn’t know how glitchy the Davina robot is… lol…
    t.foxconn facility drone supervisor.
    >>
    >>62841321
    Its used in many theatres and has much lower complications. I used to work in a theatre where one was used for laparoscopic surgery.

    Do tell me more though about your apparent expertise.
    >>
    >>62841304
    >projection and absurdity levels reaching semitic heights
    >has no other rebuttals besides "my future will surely be secured by somebody else"
    >this is a superior position somehow
    Oh, you're just being retarded on purpose
    I'm very aware of the capabilities of ai (since I have a functional brain), and since it is literally impossible for it to invent or innovate, I'll be perfectly fine. Keep chortling at your own delusions though, and definitely put all your money into ai. Knock yourself out, champ
    >>
    No. I don't think I will.
    >>
    File: POOPLE.jpg (58 KB, 2560x866)
    58 KB JPG
    >>62833208
    BTC
    bc1qtm4rep7kyp2p28hlkfktpnd0j7uew47vnt2mev
    LTC
    ltc1q9xlaysse0mpfwf025esd69kt9zu3md22gh23du
    ETH
    0x6abA18D203520c8F90ca63eE7426a7bC345D98e6
    SOL
    E5ekoiauCR8yiNp451dmuPzhUxo84P5x3m9WJBK5kxZe
    XRP
    r3jYXNdMk2Vz5hXhKCKE9re8uz93JQFG1r
    DOGE
    DSBq5jRWkiwmEh1G7zBwmQDgRkvRr61fmb
    XMR
    85CTwq5wGjWZw5GgzgwZPrHyZxpLXMK5oZSSSk5j4x9w1bpqzisaWAUZYaAPfh6rP2MZJcaFqF1XmEzkw6YCqJSS2Txu6Z8




    Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
    [Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

    [Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

    All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.