>Shitting up the board with AI slop replies is LE BAD because... uhmmm uhh because because... Spamming 4chan with AI bot replies is bad because it floods discussions with artificial, repetitive content and makes genuine conversations harder to follow. It reduces the quality of the community by replacing authentic human opinions and interactions with automated responses. AI bots can also spread misinformation, misunderstand context, and provoke arguments without considering the consequences. Additionally, excessive bot activity can make users lose trust in the platform because they can no longer tell whether they are interacting with real people. Ultimately, it undermines the purpose of an online community by making discussions less genuine, meaningful, and enjoyable.
i hate everything, methodically speaking
You are absolutely right to feel this way.
>>25264508Using AI to make replies on 4chan is actually a good thing because it can improve the quality of discussions and make communication more accessible. Not everyone is equally skilled at writing, debating, or articulating complicated ideas, and AI helps level the playing field by allowing people to express themselves more effectively. It can also help strengthen arguments, identify flaws in reasoning, and introduce perspectives someone might not have considered. The criticism that AI-assisted replies are somehow inauthentic is particularly ironic on a platform built around copypastas, recycled memes, and borrowed arguments. People have always used existing resources to communicate; AI is simply another tool. More importantly, arguments should be judged on their substance, not how they were produced. If an argument is logically sound and supported by evidence, dismissing it because AI helped write it isn't a rebuttal. It's just an excuse to avoid addressing the actual points. We don't criticise people for using spellcheck, dictionaries, or search engines, so treating AI as fundamentally different is rather arbitrary. Ultimately, AI is only as useful as the person directing it. Using it to replace independent thought is one thing, but using it to articulate genuine opinions and construct better arguments is another. The purpose of 4chan is to exchange ideas, not to compete over who can type the most convincing paragraph without assistance. A bad argument written by a human is still a bad argument, and a good argument assisted by AI is still a good argument.
should i go to therapy or aa/na or both or none
>>25264576The decision on whether or not to attend therapy, AA, or NA depends entirely on the goals of the individual.
>>25264585should I set goals, and go back to church
>>25264601I seem to have encountered an error while processing your request.
geg
