You know what they say about guys with big feet.
they're cryptids?
>>5155644big socks
>>5155644But we apes aren't known for their big junks (humans are the exception)
>>5155691timmy cope
What do they eat?
>>5156466Their own poop, that's why we never find any. They have unlocked the infinite food glitch
>>5155691it depends, genital size is directly correlated to the amount of promiscuity of females
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gigantopithecus
>>5156517
The truth is out there
>>5156526God damn
Bigfoot is 100% real by the way
>>5156713okay Bobmake another video of scientists who didn't shit themselves
>>5156757what
>>5156925i believe he's mocking gullible bigfootuber Bob Gymlan who recently posted a video revealing, like many marks, also believes in UFO disclosure, the scientist murder conspiracy, free energy, etc.people who believe in one stupid conspiracy usually believe in all of them. (bigfoot is cool but if he is real, he's an interdimensional entity of some kind, /x/, not /an/)
>>5157460The random hicks who organize Bigfoot expeditions are 100% more reasonable than a lot of the more “intellectual” ones in the community
>>5155644>Trey the Explainer makes a video saying that Bigfoot can't be real because Native American's viewed whatever creature they were seeing as a Spirit and not a full blown animal>People try to use this as a slam dunk in arguments nowThere are better ways to argue that Bigfoot isn't real but he's got people insisting on using an arguing point that doesn't work when you consider that other animals were considered spirits or something similar in the past beforeThanks Trey
>>5156713We know, now post pic of Bigfoot, the blurrier and shittier the better
>>5158947Trey truly does ruin any topic he talks about doesn't he?
>>5158948
>>5158962I wouldn't want him near the field of Cryptozoology. A skeptic can sometimes give Cryptozoology it's dues from time to time but Trey seems to have zero interest of any kind in it. He's already made up his mind and doesn't care for any of it
>>5156471kek
Bigfoot
What do you think of dogman?
>>5156466Literally any kind of animal or vegetation people can eat, what are you retarded?
>>5158962I have never seen Troon The Dilator mentioned anywhere outside of this board. You can just stop advertising him.
>>5155644https://www.ufobc.ca/Supernatural/NativeLegends/bella1.htm> (The boqs) somewhat resembles a man, its hands especially, and the region around the eyes being distinctly human. It walks on its hind legs, in a stooping posture, its long arms swinging below the knees; in height it is rather less than the average man. The entire body, except the face, is covered with long hair, the growth being most profuse on the chest which is large, corresponding to the great strength of the animal. The most peculiar feature of the animal is its penis, which is so long that it must be rolled up and carried in the arms when the creature is walking; it terrifies its enemies by striking tree-trunks and breaking branches with its uncoiled organ. It is said that a woman was once drawing water at the edge of a stream when a boqs, concealed on the other shore, extended its penis under the water to the further bank and held intercourse with her. The contact rendered her powerless, as if turned to stone; she could neither flee nor remove the organ. Her companions tried unsuccessfully to cut the organ until one of them brought a salalberry leaf, whereupon the monster, dreading its razor-like edge, withdrew.
>>5162261>Look through linked website>Read the Nookta Man from the Sky story>"Why do you Natives love copper so much">"Because a guy showed up on a copper canoe and told us our nation was doomed and we are all gonna die">"Also we killed him and looted his corpse"
>>5162408That sounds shockingly like a time traveler story.
>>5163022Sloppa
>>5164476Retard. Unless you mean slop in general instead of specifically ai slop in which case you would be right
>>5163853interesting how closely they look related after a haircut
>>5164535
>>5156757>>5157460>>5157511Bob Gymlan gets out there at times but I remember he made a point once about what near-human/upright primate intelligence might be capable of regarding navigation and avoiding attention and recognizing danger if applied to a different evolutionary trajectory and it made me think.His video about time-traveling elites going back in time to kill scientists to enable their faction in the far future to defeat their rivals was pretty silly thoughbeit.
>>5164560I find his videos really good if you take them as campfire stories and thought experiments. I don't think one has to believe in bigfoot or the supernatural to enjoy them
>>5155644Attainable natty?
i went to a big bookstore and asked a lady if they have any books on cryptozoology and she told me to go to the kids section. I felt pwnd
>>5156757I DIDNT SH*T MYSELF. DO NOT LET MY DEATH BE IN VAIN
Speaking of Bob Gymlan and books, I found a copy of this for a dollar at a lighthouse the other day
>>5164630Kino
>>5164887kek
>>5164887
Can Bob upload a bigfoot video already?
>>5166199unfortunately he fatally sh*t himself
>>5155644"Damn, those are some big feet"
>>5166199It seems like he's almost entirely moved on from Bigfoot to schizoposting, which he was already doing but now it's most of what he's doing
>>5167049He's waiting for (((disclosure))) of totez real aliums ayylmao
>>5167049I was worried this would happen when he started to believe in interdimensional bigfoot
Speaking of Bob he uploaded a new bigfoot video about a string of sightings currently going on in OhioHe also says he's going to be traveling to interview the guy heading the Finding Bigfoot film
>>5167601I watched the video but kind of just spaced out during it. I like the plumber's drawings though
>>5155644Bigfoot is based
>>5167601I liked that video. It was cool and with great art
>>5167792this story is the biggest whopper of them all. Especially when they connect the poor skier flying down the mountain to it as well.
>>5158963Is he moonwalking?
>>5167853>Have to exclude the part where one of the men in the story was a weird spiritual schizo or else no one takes this story seriously anymore
>>5168906>oh shit fuck it's the turd nephelim
I was in a bigfoot thread several years ago complaining about how I couldn't find the best bigfoot footage I'd seen cause the youtube video was old and buried by the algorithm. But I finally found it tonight. It's not as convincing as I remember it being in 2007.https://youtu.be/kt4p6FX80R4?si=eKXKXg74w1-aYJiC
>>5168975kek
>Argue that certain Cryptids are likely real and Skeptics muddy the waters too much by claiming everything as fake>Skeptics get hung up on Bigfoot insteadIt shouldn't be this miserable talking about cryptids
>>5169535Sometimes the skeptics come off as bigger schizos than the cryptid believers themselves. Like how they are like 5 totally accurate and 100% real explanations for what the Nessie picture was
>>5169555A lot of skeptics in the Cryptozoology community are just guys treating it like a Circus where they sometimes go to point and laugh at everyone else before claiming they're actually interested in the subject and think the super safe pick, the Thylacine, is still alive
>>5169555the most damning evidence for this pic is the fact that this began showing in uk theatres a few days before the first sighting of nessie
>>5169793Don't get me wrong, i don't believe for a second but, as i said, i find it laughable that people come up with many totally legit explanations for what it is. It can only be one so most are bullshitting
>>5169795*I don't believe it for a secondfuck
>>5169795yeah the dead baby elephant explanation is the funniest one for me
monke....
>>5169795It's because most Skeptics have no idea what they're looking at either but they're just as unwilling to admit it, so they come up with explanations and theories that almost never match the description of what the supposed witness claimed to see
>>5169793No. Don't fall for that sort of narrative.That posture was the standard scientific depiction for nearly a century by that point. "Oh but X was in a movie theater at that time" implies that the hoaxer or witness saw the movie, which is a bigger leap in logic that it being a coincidence.They do the same thing with the first Chupacabra sighting.>"Si, senor, scary grey alien with spikes on it!">"THERE WAS AN ALIEN MOVIE CALLED SPECIES IN THAT SAME YEAR! THERE MUST BE A CORRELATION!"And then you find out the sighting happened in April and the movie came out in like July.
>>5170298the movie came out in the uk shortly before the sighting in this case
>>5169798kek i never heard that one before
>>5170298I never got the species thing because the alien in the movie doesn't even look like the described creature
>>5170319So what? No proof that the hoaxer saw the movie.It's a non-argument that speaks to the worst kind of skeptic logic. "Humans are incapable of imagining new things, therefore they could only have gotten the idea for a cryptid from existing popular culture."Bringing up the movie adds nothing, because plesiosaurs were depicted in that manner by scientific literature during that era. It was a standard reconstruction. That's where the hoax's position originated from, not "an obscure movie that nobody saw".
>>5170484I'n with you, but an obscure movie? Nigga that's King Kong.
>>5164560Bob makes compelling bigfoot videos and introduced me to the gorilla-style quad-runner bigfoot theory, but it does undermine cases where bigfeets run without dropping into monkey mode.The fact that he didn't mention that woman was repeating the plot to The Time Machine annoyed me. The fun thing about bigfoot is you can kinda get as outlandish as you want and can't prove any of it isn't true. Also dislike that he once uploaded a fictional story he wrote and passed it off as real, hallucinates monsters and saw ghosts.
>Skeptics get uppity when anyone tries to scrutinize Finding BigfootI'm not gonna argue whether the PGF is real or not, I just think showing up to a con to slyly get an old man who has bad hearing and is currently pushing 100 to say "yes" to everything you ask, is a really scummy way to say "He admitted to it!" and pass it off as legit
>>5171201>he once uploaded a fictional story he wrote and passed it off as realWhich one was it?
>>5171234Something not about bigfoot, can't remember now. Not sure if it's still up, I recall him apologising for it.
>>5171201Bob should stick to Bigfoot videos. Whenever he tries straying away from Bigfoot you realize that the dudes unironically crazyI his crazy is what allows him to make good Bigfoot videos because he's far interested in the mechanism of how a genuine ape species like that would work. Like it's obvious he's repeatedly gotten into arguments about it and had to work a good counterargument instead of taking the easy "Interdimensional" route some people insist onLike how he has to remind people that pictures taken from an iphone suck most of the time or that Bigfoots probably aren't 7ft tall giants, they're just brawny and that's going to play a factor in the recounting based off memory
>>5171428>short king bigfoot hypothesis
>>5171428>Bigfoots probably aren't 7ft tall giants, they're just brawny and that's going to play a factor in the recounting based off memoryI never thought of that but that's probably right. People are always surprised when i tell them gorillas are bellow 6ft on average and tell me they thought they were 7-8ft tall
