I'd still consider myself a beginner, even though I've been modeling for about a year. I wanted to ask for tips on modeling "vag" and "pen". More specifically, what's considered good topology for them without adding unnecessary mesh density?I have a decent understanding of topology in general, but I have no experience with "vag" or "pen" topology, so I'd really appreciate any guidance, topology references, or learning resources. If anyone knows good tutorials or can point me toward resources for creating models intended for NSFW animation, I'd love to learn.Any advice is greatly appreciated. Thanks!
The most important thing to know is they arent perfectly symmetrical, neither sexes genitals I mean, and skin has a different texture. Modeling by pushing polygons into between the hip bones first may help with a sense of scale for a vagina. And male genitals protrude from within the pelvis, they aren't just an attachment.
>>1030954if you're serious about learning about genital topology, just go to smutbase and study topology from characters you like. There's even some penis/vagina CC-0 meshes you could grab if you're lazy.Also for the body in your screenshot: Both workflows (subdiv and sculpting) will get close to the same result but sculpting is easier because you're not worrying about topology until after the character is formed. You CAN get similar results doing subdiv but it will be nowhere near as efficient and the time you spend correcting topology as you add or remove curves could have been spent studying anatomy and sculpting
>>1030954you can find daz genitals which you can put into blender to then use how you want or improve on instead of trying to model your own from scratch.
You can say vagina and penis anon, the teacher won't hear us.
boys have penisgirls have vagina
>>1030954>Good topology for genitalsIt's a cylinder and the other is a negative space cylinder shape. Take a guess what good topology looks like here.
I put it like this to avoid getting my thread taken down since 3DCG is not within the NSFW category
>>1030982lol
>>1030954It depends on what type you're trying to do (innie vs outie) but the principle of 3 insets is still the same. One inset for the labia, one inset within that for the clitorial hood, another for the opening itself. You can even add the urethra if you want, but that could just be textured in IMO.Whatever you do, don't be a lazy smutbase third worlder.
i hear actually getting pussy in real life helps"anon what are you doing down there?""babe your lips need a retopo or i am not seeing the edge loops right"
>>1030954Don't instigate lust in you or in others. It damages the brain. It was scientifically proven. The data is available for you.BUT...If you intend to make Fine Art, I'm fine with that.
>>1031017eh downloading ready-made genitals isn't so bad especially not if they're rigged. Head hacking onto a KM body... that's where I draw the line. Seriously there are so many other body bases out there and those still get chosen for what I can only assume is shock value
>>1034109KM?
>>1034112kabalmystic_(modeler) will get you tons of results on e621. They made a series of male+female hyper/futa/muscle/fat bodies and while some animations are decent quality it's one of those that when you see it in porn you either immediately click away or favorite immediately and there's not really an inbetween. Most people from that era have moved on already from hating on it, but there's still a few anons apparently
>>1034113>Look it up>It's all trash
>>1034114>being unable to enjoy something even in the slightest because you want to be smug about your taste on an indian cow shit patty forum >anime reaction png with a 4chan filenameI'm not even defending the quality of KM porn here, you just need to lurk more
>>1034116Well you see.. people are allowed to have an opinionI don't need to share in your bad taste Also>Lurk more
>>1034117lurk more newfag
>>1034118I'm not sure how you are defending your case by saying that to me..But in the end there is nothing to defend either way as I am correct. You are free to have your opinion, I'm free to have mine.But whatever works for you, child who does not know what a unix timestamp is
>>1034119there's no case, it's not an argument, you're underage. lurk more.
>>1034119Look, I'm sorry that you couldn't be there when this website was cool. You missed it, it's okay can't help it. Talking like that won't change it.
>>1034121>>1034120
>>1034113>kabalmystic_(modeler)This guy is responsible for so much garbage spam it is insane
>>1034125the less you engage with it the less it gets posted, use your muted words and blacklists that gets 99% of KM off the internet and out of mind
>>1030954My advice, retopologize an existing model to match your workflow.
>>1034130How's it worked for you? What do your models look like?
>>1034138I simply can't show you the cunt, not here on the blueboard, but I can show you my base mesh here: >>1033962it depends on the type of cunt you use (rigged or morphed).
