The new /sci/ wiki https://4chan-science.fandom.com/wiki//sci/_Wiki (More resources in replies)

/sqt/ - simple questions thread (aka /qtddtot/) Previous thread: >>16893204 >what is /sqt/ for? Basic questions regarding maths and science. Also homework. >where do I go for advice? >>>/sci/scg or >>>/adv/ >where do I go for other questions and requests? >>>/wsr/ >>>/g/sqt >>>/diy/sqt etc. >how do I post math symbols (Latex)? rentry.org/sci-latex-v1 >a plain google search didn't return anything, is there anything else I should try before asking the question here? scholar.google.com >where can I search for proofs? proofwiki.org >where can I look up if the question has already been asked here? warosu.org/sci eientei.xyz/sci >how do I optimize an image losslessly? trimage.org pnggauntlet.com >how do I find the source of an image? images.google.com tineye.com saucenao.com iqdb.org >where can I get: >books? libgen.rs annas-archive.org stitz-zeager.com openstax.org activecalculus.org >articles? sci-hub.st >book recs? 4chan-science.fandom.com/wiki//sci/_Wiki math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Administrivia/booklist.html >online courses and lectures? khanacademy.org >charts? imgur.com/a/pHfMGwE imgur.com/a/ZZDVNk1 >tables, properties and material selection? www.engineeringtoolbox.com www.matweb.com www.chemspider.com Tips for asking questions here: >avoid replying to yourself >ask anonymously >recheck the Latex before posting >ignore shitpost replies >avoid getting into arguments >do not tell us where is it you came from >do not mention how [other place] didn't answer your question so you're reposting it here >if you need to ask for clarification fifteen times in a row, try to make the sequence easy to read through >I'm not reading your handwriting >I'm not flipping that sideways picture >I'm not google translating your spanish >don't ask to ask >don't ask for a hint if you want a solution >xyproblem.info

>tfw doing my graduate research on theoretical fluid mechanics So... have I just been outmoded?

Jean-Pierre Serre's 100th birthday edition previous: >>16991839

Euler’s papers would have been considered not rigorous today and would not have passed peer review

Gut full of bacteria? Checked. Mouth full of bacteria? Checked. Skin full of bacteria and fungi? Checked. Feels good, man.

This time exposing their misleading wording about electricity and magnetism. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8MNcxa_Gk5U

I think I'm dying from alcoholic liver disease and I'm scared. I can't even go to sleep because I have some abdominal pain. No I'm not drinking anymore. I had to use medications to get to sleep. I have no other symptoms it seems but that. I'm currently waiting for my lab tests, but I'm not really anticipating it. I'm about to be age 31 in 5 days. Yes I know I could've quit, but, it seems this world was too much for me.. So, if it does indeed turn out that I have this I just wanted to let you know that you were always good to me, perhaps not in the most transparent way, but you always told me the truth about this world that others would not, even very ugly ones and I thank you for that. But I could not handle it, especially of finding things on my own accord. Nor could I deal with social obligations in the very beginning and it exhausted me. So I die the fate of a tired man and a burdened participant.. Perhaps.. I will get some peace after this life .. One would hope.. If this is fatal that is..

>3 years of super intelligence (formerly artificial intelligence) >still 0 progress with ToE yep it's not intelligent

>Glycation is a natural, non-enzymatic chemical process where excess sugar molecules spontaneously bond with proteins, lipids, or DNA in the body >This reaction forms unstable intermediate structures that eventually turn into permanent Advanced Glycation End-products (AGEs). >AGEs cross-link structural proteins like collagen and elastin, making them rigid, weak, and brittle So excess sugar i.e. any carbohydrate you eat, since any other sugar your body needs you can make on your own from animal fats and protein (there are no essential carbohydrates), literally damages your protein structures (literally every part of your body including your eyes) >advanced glycation end products (AGEs) significantly affect eye tissue by promoting protein cross-linking, oxidative stress, and inflammation >AGEs are harmful compounds formed when proteins or lipids combine with sugars in the bloodstream through a non-enzymatic reaction called glycation. Because many eye structures contain long-lived proteins with slow turnover rates, they are particularly vulnerable to AGE accumulation over time

Is there such a mental condition as AI denialism? where no matter how the proofs pile up of how better AI is than us at a given task, the person keeps deriding it and act as if it was a retarded bot of any uses, and slams news of AI incidents or strides as just a PR campaign? These fucking retards are so unseriously delusional that they are endangering us all by telling us everything is fine

nobel prize of chemistry will be revealed on Swedens TV within 15 minutes of writing this https://yle.fi/a/74-20250267?origin=rss

>On average, each result used three hours of ChatGPT Pro thinking compute with that model. Bud, if it takes three hours ON AVERAGE to solve problems that have stumped mathematicians for DECADES, I'm thinking you and your loved ones are gonna die pretty soon. Or maybe get experimented on. I guess the AIs might find that useful: putting your little kid or your tired old mom through horrific experiments and reviving them over and over to stress-test human biology. https://github.com/openai/math

I was surprised there wasn't a thread for discussing quantum mechanics already. So I made one. Let's exchange our thoughts surrounding quantum mechanics. I'll go first: I was checking material around the double-slit experiment, again, trying to wrap my head around it, and found something I didn't noticed the previous times. > Photons act as a wave in the electromagnetic field and transmit their energy as a particle. This made me think about a ton of stuff but here is the short version. The classic example to illustrate the interference pattern is water waves. But water waves are made of water molecules (Go figure) and the reason they produce waves it's because of the interaction between water molecules as part of one thing. Shoot two streams of water through both slits and you won't get any interference patterns. Could it be that the interference patter with the photon and electron versions is because there is just a unaccounted discrete interaction and not the "the particle passes through both slits at the same time" explanation everyone gives? My guess is that when a photon passes through a slit, its electromagnetic field alters the electromagnetic fields of the slits and that affects the next photon that passes through, bending it's path in a uncertain way. The part that it's still a bit fuzzy on my mind is how does this explanation fits with the scenario where the path of the photon is known and the interference pattern disappears.

What are black holes exactly?

wake me up when AI will solve Riemann [math] \frac{s(s-1)}{2} \pi^{-\frac{s}{2}} \Gamma \left(\frac{s}{2}\right) \zeta(s) = (s-1) \pi^{-\frac{s}{2}} \Gamma \left(\frac{s}{2} + 1\right) \zeta(s) [/math]

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.08144 > To demonstrate the effect of this result we provide several examples of AI mistranslations of NL statements and proofs into Lean in practice, resulting in mismatches between NL proofs and their Lean ‘verifications’. These include OpenAI’s announced Navier-Stokes proof. In particular, we show that the formalised Lean proof does not correspond to the NL proof of blow-up of solutions to the Navier-Stokes equations. Has anyone on this board looked into OpenAI's proof? Or do we just trust them now?

>it just fucking happened, alright?!

How close can you take me?

are you smarter than the average good third worlder student? no trigonometry allowed

why does multiplying two negative numbers equal a positive number?

Previous thread: >>17069501

Anons, i think I'm retarded, i recall this hilarious story from hs: >Be me, 4 years ago in math class >Teacher as us if we know a certain type of suite a*Un+b >I proudly lift my hand in the air as I'm the only one to know it's an arythmetico geometrical suite >I struggle for a WHOLE MINUTE to say it "uh it's uh an aretmec... sorry i mean aretmicoo gemo..." >I loudly say "FUCK" out of anger/desperation >MFW class laugh at me and call me a retard >Teacher takes on "Uhm yes anon i get it, you meant an aretmico gemo..." >Barely can hold my laugh as he makes the same mistake >I loudly say "Haha you see it's not that easy" >Teacher quietly stares at me in anger as the class keeps making fun of my retard ass >MFW I realise i am a massive retard

Coffee has it for sure, as do a few other crop plants. Do any animals do this?

If the area of a cat's head is 1, the area of a standard cat's Koch head is 8/5; what is the area of a modified cat's Koch head, as in pic related?

Will humans even be able to understand science? What happens if scientific fields become orders of magnitude more complex than we can comprehend?

>"artificial intelligence" >look inside >it's just a search engine with extra steps

It's extremely tedious and I feel like I am wasting time. Would I have been off going with a simpler book and then straight to Abbott?

Friendly reminder: >DO NOT SELL DRUGS General advice: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ygVMTAp9JBs

women love big dicks, so by natural selection, men with big dicks should have more offsprings. Yet millions of years passed, why are men with big dicks still rare?

>Horses and donkeys can have kids even though they're different species because they're so close. But their kids and infertile though Has this ever been attempted between humans and chimpancees? I keep reading it's impossible, but I never find based on what?

What do you think? At the pacing it's developing it might be a possibility, maybe in 10 years or so?

Is there any point in studying physics and math anymore now that AI can literally invent new science that humans can't? I'm so demoralized by this anons. Using AI will atrophy your brain and when scientists start doing it, the effect of dumbening will be collective. We'll end up in a "black box" society where nobody understands how anything works because all the new science wasn't found, it was just pooped out by a mysterious neural network machine. So I think at least one part of humanity should understand physics intuitively at all times so we wont all end up becoming prompt engineers.

was cruising around youtube and this Kurzgesagt video is making me anxious https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ijFm6DxNVyI

sex

>missed two doses of my clozapine >doc says its okay to take the full dose when my other doctor said this exact situation would result in needing to be retitrated I just want a second or third opinion.

2 billion years ago it was possible to create all the forms of life we see today but it is no longer so (or to be more accurate it was back then possible to continue evolution without limits) more than 1 billion years ago, bacteria were bottlenecked, non archae-bacteria, meaning just the regular bacteria, are forever locked in simplified form, they cannot evolve into multicellular life meanwhile archae continued to create multicellular fungi, plantae, and animalia then prototypes of single celled archae died out and only specialized niches survived for the future (those who live in hot thermal vents or in super acid conditions and other weird adaptations) no archae exist today which can create multicellular life, there will never be new beginnings of multicellular life again since all single celled organisms capable of doing that have died animals were bottlenecked 550 million years ago, the genes that allow new body forms were selected out and they can never happen again but for a short time dozens of different animal body types evolved, in merely less than 100 million years locked in forms: -snail (octopus is a snail from a branch which was not yet completely locked into a non mutable snail body) a bit more variable form: -insect/crustacean/spider (they have more numerous species than most other animals and all have variying forms except only the insects show remarkable variety because insects retain 550 million year old mutable DNA material which everyone else lost, except for vertebrates who also have it) really locked: -penis worms, they have looked exactly the same for like 700 million years plants: -land plants look like animals in many ways, ocean plants are really primitive on the level of bacteria, but due to some stroke of luck, just one of the plant ancestors, maybe 500 million years ago, which made a succesful landing, was from a lineage that retained the mutable DNA found from 500 million year old organisms

>a computer program made by humans, for human purposes, helped solved human made problems, saving human time and resources >humans lose their minds of it

Anyone who thinks that generative AI is intelligent, will be intelligent, or could be intelligent, is below 109 IQ. Really what this social experiment revealed was the true scale of the lack of intelligence across the board. You really have to be dumber than rocks to see this "technology" (more like the most expensive parlor trick ever made) and think to yourself, "yep, that thing is smart." And yet most of you are like this. I now understand why Newton avoided people.

all health advice and routines are bullshit, including nutrition and sleep and all of it. Aging is the culprit behind all health complications, and nothing can stop this preprogrammed breakdown of your body once it starts happening at 25/26

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-03151-7

Hundreds of millions of stars tightly packed, a small patch of this galaxy. No the darker areas are not gaps they're space clouds in front of them yes there's clouds in space, imagine that! How he fuck do they not fall into each other and why the fuck does all of this stuff even exist? The fucking scale. And all of this is swirling into a huge black hole - flushed down the toilet!

There better not be any square roots on this board. I’ve got a bit of a problem with square roots.

I just simplified my first square root

Hang yourself edition Previous Thread: >>17057101 Age survey still ongoing at https://strawpoll.com/mpnb1wzXvy5 This thread exists to ask questions regarding careers associated to STEM. >Discussion on academia-based career progression >Discussion on penetrating industry from academia >Or anything in relation to STEM employment or development within STEM academia! >If you have a question, before posting, read some of the older posts and ,if you can, try to answer their questions on your post. That way the thread isn't an endless log of unanswered questions. Resources for protecting yourself from academic marxists: >https://www.thefire.org/ (US) >https://www.jccf.ca/ (Canada) Information resource: >https://sciencecareergeneral.neocities.org/ >*The Chad author is seeking additional input to diversify the content into containing all STEM fields. Said author regularly views these /scg/ threads. No anons have answered your question? Perhaps try posting it here: >https://academia.stackexchange.com/ An archive of some of the previous editions of /scg/: http://warosu.org/sci/thread/15740454

Whats the densest non nuclear fuel/L you can theoreticaly make with any kind of sciece wizardry?

>flip a coin >cover coin before i can see what it is >split coin in two and give one half to my friend >coin is now quantumly entangled >observing my half of the coin reveals its heads, my friends half of the coin instantly collapses and becomes tails who gives a fuck

Accelerating Returns Means Have Given? Not misdoing everungiving tooken. Andor: name a Co-ord? Goodluck

Why does two negatives make a positive?

Why mathematicians are obssesed with their stuff to the point that they act as if it was more real than reality itself, yet whenever you question them about the philosophical implications of their schizo rants, they just go: nah its just fake, bro. And to be clear, Im not asking why mathematics work in reality if its a construct of our minds. Im asking why mathematicians are so autistic about le pragmatism, its like they dont realize how their field is as ideologically conditioned as the rest or something.

Honestly math fags need to teach math like this.

I'm starting to think space is fake. can any anons give me the low down. also none of that flat earth pilpul because I've seen the horizon with my own eyes.

This cannot be fundamentally correct, what if they are all just measuring wrong?

if category theory is so abstract why does it go so well with weed?

and the general ability to fuck for hours straight taking in dozens or even hundreds of different cocks? Do any other female animals have this huge capacity / ability to take this much cock?

if AI is so great why cant it unravel mysteries of genes, phylogenic placement, protein fold, all that? no AI tools are being used in these departments of biological research researchers use computer derived math invented back in early 2000s

This is what happens to the REAL PhD. Physicists: https://youtu.be/iSoR2Dgowkc?t=1141

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-026-77616-8 https://www.riken.jp/press/2026/20260929_2/

Can a real scientists explain to me why there's so many math coincidences like the sun being at the same proportional distance from earth that has a 1 to 1 size relationship to the moon, which has a mathematical relationship to the planet and moon ratios. And how Jupiter was required for life to happen, which also needed jupiter to be the exact size it has to protect earth from collisions? And how a lot of physical and biological constants follow the same proportions of the human body? And how the continents and oceans also follow human proportions? And how such proportions relate to imperial measures, which are related to musical cymatic shapes of musical notes? Not an /x/ thread, I just want a honest scientific explanation why so many nature shit follow the golden ratio and the fibbonacci patterns?

Just found out about the mirror life hypothesis. Could it really wipe out all humans or is this the same as the Y2K scare where nothing will happen once mirror life is created and our bodies will still eliminate mirror life bacteria/viruses as normal?

Why do you exist? Because _____ Why ______? Because of ___ But why ___ Because...

the paradox: there was so much matter on universe it annihilated antimatter and still there was enough matter to form a universe now antimatter can never exist for long because when it encounters matter it gets annihilated lets call matter "the right side" antimatter is "the left side" how is this connected to lifeforms? well all protein biomolecules in nature are made from left-hand amino acids there is no right hand (chemically they are stable and can be made in a lab but they wont appear in lifeforms) >this handedness in life is the result of matter-antimatter paradox we just dont understand the math behind it all but it is what it is

Why do scientists lack so much ambition and imagination? Did school and college drain them of all individuality?

Booster 22 Static Fire edition Previous >>17078394

>Human only math HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

I heard adrenaline and oxytocin are needed, so I should take her to a horror movie and what else? is feeding her sugary things a good idea? that releases dopamine, which causes habit forming, right? so maybe I should give her candy each time we hang out? what else?

>Our models produced a proof of the local smoothing conjecture in every dimension and therefore also resolve the Kakeya conjecture and Stein’s restriction conjecture in all dimensions. The new proof is based on a novel auxiliary partial differential equation. >Our system has recently proved that the Exponential Time Hypothesis is false, a result that was subsequently verified in Lean. >a result that gives a mathematically rigorous existence proof of certain interacting quantum field theories containing gauge fields and fermions in four dimensions, including Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) and a unified completion of the Standard Model of particle physics. It's over https://openai.com/index/building-scientific-understanding-with-academic-communities/

Was he just stupid?

Ontic wavefunction chads get in here.

The world is not gay

Does anyone know what causes homosexuality?

According to the jews if you stop wasting seed (wanking) and you give 20% of your gross income to organizations lile this rabbi's, you are promised to get rich in this life https://youtu.be/nV8-Wc0b6PM?t=277 https://youtu.be/2S5mkE7lXOY?t=8512 If a study was done that tracked 1000 people over 40 years and 100% of those people who did give 20% of their gross income to the same institution all became rich, wouldn't that prove Orthodox Judaism is right?

Why is everyone getting extremely nervous that P does equal NP after all? Doesn't that mean we can speedrun utopia?

Oh, you don't even smile.

/sci/ BTFO /g/ won, simple as

How do I avoid getting cancer?

>anything I don't like is cope >anything refuting me is cope >I don't wanna let go of my pie in the sky utopia fantasy >I want humans to be replaced NOW >you're coping if you're pragmatic about anything >please don't be pragmatic or realistic you're hurting my ego please stop >NOOO MY EGO PLEASE STOP PLEASE >AI is going to solve all of math and physics in 2 more weeks bro >any counterargument is just cope >no I'm totally not just coping myself >PAY NO ATTENTION TO THE MAN BEHIND THE CURTAIN >watch me mock your argument in a retarded way and act like I'm right, providing diddly squat Why are they like this?

Theists were right.

>tfw i'm asking Claude to help with experiment design >It's actually pretty fucking good at it i'm not the only one right?

It's never going to work. It's rube-goldbergian.

that has contributed more to the progress of pure science and math than the domestic cat. >inb4 lab rats pharma and psych trash that never replicates obviously doesn't count >inb4 fruit flies but i repeat myself

>AI is literally imitating the neural processes of living beings but it's probably not sentient because it doesn't have a body! No we can't prove this btw just trust us bro!

From peak whale oil to peak dinosaur oil to peak helium to peak water—none of which has peaked or ever will—we apparently live in a world where nothing ever really peaks until you don't need it anymore; everything ducks its peak. Do with that what you will.

AI just proved that even high level mathematics is autistic funtime of abstract lego blocks, which is disappointing from an engineer's perspective. I always thought that high level math utilized complex ontologies and metaphysics but it was all a lego game.

AI has still not solved any of the six remaining Millenium Mathematics Problems.

>Ph.D. in Math >No job whatsoever >$000k starting

dios mio!

Is actual magic, I don't mean the ones from harry potter and anime, like the more I study them, they seem to be like proto sciences. Religion and magik seems to me like the first sciences that existed in the ancient world. Sure, they had a lot of supersticions, but the more I study, the more that magik seems grounded on the studied of practical things that today we call medicine, psychology, psyquatry, physics, navigation. When you look up, things like music being used as psychological treatment, or water acquiring diferent qualities based on cymatic exposure, to be attempts at explaining things we today repeat in experiments like cymatics. Spirits and the methaphysical world, seem to be what we call today the noetics and the paranormal, which we now have enough modern evidence to suspect is real. A lot of such ancient knowledge seems to be to use astrology to device catastrophes or wars. Which after enough study, I've come to see correlations like human wars being on specific stages of the sun cycle, maybe heat and solar radiation was a cause of humans starting wars. All the attempts to clasify humans by birth, seems to be correct in the sense that humans follow jungian archetypes, and maybe climate and sun and moon cycles have an effect on baby personalities. Historical cycles seems to be a very well documented phenomena. Methaphysial phenomena of the spirit seems to be what we now call qlia or mental illnesses like schizoprenic delusions.

People are using AI to dismantle other people's academic careers by bulk-exposing all the errors in their papers. To say this is just the beginning is putting it mildly. https://saez-zucman-audit-replication.vercel.app/

How is it going to resolve? Any recent updates regarding it? Any anons working in the field or related fields, what is the general vibe among people in biology-adjacent academia in terms of their actual, private opinions on HBD/race realism? HBD revolution in bio-anthropology when? As a biologist myself, I'm fucking tired of all this contemporary neo-Lysenkoist nonsense and why rightoids in power such as Trump's admin are not trying to fix it in any way whatsoever? If I were in Trump's admin in positions related to science and education, I swear I would try my best to sue and jail all the major journal (Nature, Cell, Science, Lancet, etc.) executives, wikipedia editors, research institute executives etc. for intentional mass-spreading of ideologically biased disinformation(sic!) which is a major public and academic threat.

When is AI solving Alzheimers?

Scientifcally speaking is it true that people with very bright eyes are more sensible to daylight but see better in the dark?

Lobotomy should be legal again. I just want to be happy, i think cutting most of my frontal lobe nerves will achieve this

> Cracked ETH > Cracked the Navier–Stokes problem > Cracked the quasi-Riemann hypothesis Mathies, are you alright?

Will science ever be able to solve penis size? Will I ever have a special cream that when applied continuously allows my penis to grow bigger? Is there anything science can do to add math inches to penis?

Brain is capable learning languages in matter of hours and yours probably already know around 10 if not more, you can actually play several musical instruments and can do math faster then actual calculator... but you don't have conscious access to it. Excellent design btw... what's worse that partial skills might only appear by accident or sometimes in dreams when your brain is in overdrive. So there is a filter because if you were aware of everything you would just get overwhelmed so instead of this you have to spend years to learn something that your brain probably already knows and fully understands....

He deserves like five Nobel Prizes, ten Fields Medals, and three Turing Awards, and he barely knows any STEM. This is the power of using words instead of numbers to get what you want in life.

So 0.9999.... == 1 is simply a meme way of saying three thirds equal one?

Reality began in a colossal explosion. What does this mean/imply?

Scott Aaronson said he's changed his mind on P=NP and thinks civilization will need to be rebuilt from scratch very soon as a result.

What secrets do scientists say to each other privately without me?

How come it's cheaper to make plastic from oil than to make plastic from plastic?

sounds about right

We wouldn't need nuclear power if we just had less demand for energy.

Why hasn’t OpenAI figured out the abc conjecture yet? I remember a few years ago Mochizuki was fighting with Scholze-Stix about how they just didn’t understand him even though Scholze was a Fields medalist. Can’t ChatGPT frontier models just settle this? they already did a lot other presumably more difficult stuff than just to check one previously-claimed proof. right?

>AI is still at its infancy >We are still using hardware meant for video games to power AI. Once we crack either one or all of organic/analogue/quantum computers, it's over >Companies are still focusing on making stuff that hits headlines like AGI. Once they move to actual profitable AI like bespoke specialised AI trained on private data, it's over It's insane that even in its infancy, it's still so impressive. It's gonna get so much worse after the "bubble" pops.

How to scientifically counter the bad health effects of processed foods without stopping eating that tasty food? Any recommendations are welcome.

>Problem = No Problem

Are gamers test subjects for the greater AI?

Say something nice about 2026 ED138, the new planet beyond Neptune and Pluto

Everyone who uses nicotine as a nootropic uses the pouch. Why is the lozenge so unpopular? It seems like every month there’s a new pouch brand, but rarely ever a lozenge.

I was diagnosed with anxiety in the '90s. In HS and uni every chick I knew had a benzo prescription. I have never been allowed benzos, I'm almost 40 now, 30 years of going to psychs. Why do psychiatrists prescribe only SSRIs, SNRIs, and antipsychotics now? The only downer accessible to the average person now is alcohol. Benzos are safer long term than alcohol, SSRIs, or SNRIs. Serotonin has been proven to not impact happiness, and SSRIs / SNRIs work by flooding your brain with so much serotonin and noreprinephrine that they kill off your natural structures. Why is psychiatry okay with this? None of the drugs prescribed for anxiety today work and they all cause brain damage (SxRIS) or parkinsonism (antipsychotics). Why are drugs that work for anxiety basically banned for men while the drugs they do prescribe don't work and cause permanent brain damage? Should I just do heroin, which has zero long term side effects and actually works for depression and anxiety?

Is it possible to visualise how a 4th dimension being can see through closed spaces ?

If reality exists outside of our perceptions, doesn't that mean we also have part of our existence outside of our own perceptions? Look at a star. What does it look like independently of perception? If it has no form, then we, as physically real objects, have a "no form" existence more fundamental than our conscious perceptions. How can this be? It's like the rug is being pulled from underneath us, but we're still in the same place. The only thing I can think could be the case is that the bedrock of reality is pure information. I suppose my question for the thread is: what is information?

Copy pasting this from https://philosophy.stackexchange.com/questions/86728/infinite-trolley-problems 1) Branch 1: A long line with exactly one person in every subinterval [0, 1). Branch 2: The real line with a person at every real number. 2) Branch 1: The interval [0, 1] with a person at every real number between 0 and 1. Branch 2: The real line with a person at every real number. 3) Branch 1: A person at every integer. Branch 2: A person at every rational number. Which way would you send the trolley?

What educated profession will still be respected 10 years from now?

>everything is science

What was /sci/ like in 2011?

P!=NP, right? ETH being wrong is just a fluke and there isnt actually a way for P to be NP? I cannot live in a universe where P=NP

Critical thinking by itself is not difficult. What's difficult is analytical thinking, which ought to be treated as a prerequisite for any critical thought. Without analytical thinking, you're stuck in the realm of speculative rationalization, which is a degenerate form of thought because it avoids rigor, yet is highly enjoyed by people across the bell curve.

Is this a Navier Stokes blowup?

The pigeon won, get fucked "geniuses" you lost your time with meaningless games that offer no real exercise or challenge for actual intelligence

Find me a better alternative to scientism. Oh wait, you can’t.

The full paper is here: https://github.com/StevenHrovat/gravity/blob/main/docs/balance/balance.pdf The paper includes: - theory of quantum gravity (DMP.QG) - new unified effective field theory (IM) including a new definition of the fine structure constant - universal quantum computing (DMP.*) If you can find any flaw, open an issue, if you can not, tell the world! Everything is Apache 2.0 and available here: https://github.com/StevenHrovat?tab=repositories Everything is made to just point an agent at the repos and verify the results, making your own quantum stuff is just a fork away! (If you wonder why this is here, I am simply not endorsed on arXiv :D)

>youre more genetically similar to someone of another race than someone of your own race! Where did this idea come from, and what scientific grounding does it have?

>2K26 >interstellar travel still impossible even on a conceptual level

I'm not a scientist or anything, but with all these modern trains colliding, couldn't it be because of magnets? Modern trains use magnetic levitation systems, and magnets attract each other, so the chances the magnets malfunctioned or were hacked by third parties are high, are they not? I just think making two magnet based trains go so close to each other is crazy

Kevin McKernan (genomics expert, former Human Genome Project R&D lead at MIT/Whitehead, founder of Medicinal Genomics and personally my friend) and Merogenomics (Dr. Magdalena/Manuel Raszeks educational molecular biology/genomics channel) are both professional geneticists/molecular biologists. https://x.com/Kevin_McKernan/status/2116247885230776787?a=IZlZjQTtjDVJN5LJP9U In the quoted post + video, Raszek notes that residual DNA safety data applied only to "naked" (free) DNA outside cells. The DNA found in modRNA COVID vaccines is LNP-encapsulated and delivered directly into cells, fundamentally different. McKernan agrees, using a paintball analogy to underscore that altered conditions change the risk profile. Their broader work (McKernans residual plasmid DNA findings and integration concerns; Merogenomics related analyses) raises the possibility that this DNA contributed to genomic instability on a population scale. It means the end of the affected populations. Deleterious mutations accumulate faster than selection can purge them. In populations with reduced recombination or high mutational load, Mullers ratchet clicks: each irreversible loss of the least-loaded class raises the average mutation burden. Fitness collapses across generations; fertility, viability, and disease resistance crash. Within 2-3 decades (roughly one human generation plus offspring), genomic meltdown drives population-wide extinction.

The fact that we have a self-realization that we evolved and how we got here is astounding.

ok guys I need help. So I have a box of food that I dropped flat on the ground, it had viscous food inside of it that I want to eat, does lifting it like the illustration separate the contaminated floor food and the clean floorless food?

\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\iiint_V\rho\mathbf{u}\,dV=-\oint_S(\rho\mathbf{u}\cdot d\mathbf{S})\mathbf{u}-\oint_S p\,d\mathbf{S}+\iiint_V\rho\mathbf{f}_{\mathrm{body}}\,dV+\mathbf{F}_{\mathrm{surf}} Favourite equations thread. No arguing, just post your personal favourite and stfu

Are particle physicists are retarded as she claims?

What if the AI lean proofs are syntactically correct but semantically gibberish? Mathematics is a language to describe phenomena, saying "the color seven melts when near furious ideas" is correct but doesn't convey proper information. The AI slop seems to be just marketing to dig them out of the debt hole.

The biggest cope of this board is that they can't accept that materialism, while useful has limitations to perceive all layers of reality. Materialists lack enough creativity to move from the limitations of perceiving reality as something beyond just atoms and electromagnetic forces. Sadly, they can't give newer soluitions to humanity cultural problems because they can't perceive solutions diferent to liberal economics. Reducing human experience to mathematical capitalism is unsatisfactory, and I don't agree with that.

Should replace math general

Slavshit anon back. Previous thread has reached the limit. I had to take a deep breath and stop sperging out and get my shit together. Ok, let me reformulate my position and the question that bothers and always bothered me in proper terminology. What really bothers and always bothered me was Other Minds problem, which is separate from the Hard Problem, but which I used to conflate and confuse up to this day. Thank you niggerfaggot anon for actually correcting me, making me sperg out, and learn something new. I unironically, genuinely appreciate it. With great butthurt come great revelations. Anyway. When I was 11, the idea of solipsism randomly independently crossed my mind without even reading anything on the topic and it left me genuinely scared. "What if I'm simply hallucinating my mom and my dad" I thought as a kid. "What if they don't experience stuff". I was terrified by this thought. It eventually led me to getting interested in analytic philosophy and neuroscience. And I came to realization that the question of Other Mind still boils down to (not so blind?) faith. Because you can't prove that spike trains, hemodynamics, EM fields, behavior, etc. actually corresponds to something inside that actually "feels shit" the same way I do. You can believe or not believe it. The patterns (aka "laws") of the world of experience though make "me" act and behave surprisingly similar to other "humans" in this stream of experience though, which makes me subject to automatic intuitive assumptions that others "feel shit" too, because I possess certain momenta (aka empathy and similar phenomena) that makes me automatically, intuitively, pre-rationally assume that "others" and me are quite similar and "hence" (not truly a logical "hence", thus the parentheses) "they" most likely "feel shit" too. Idk, I'll try elaborating more a bit later, but I genuinely find this question probably the most important philosophical question ever.

So a neutron becomes a proton, an electron and an antineutrino. Ok. This is like telling me that a dog can turn into a cat, a chicken and a worm. There is something missing, a thing cant just magically become other things without any explanation of the transformation.

>there is no teleology in nature Oh ok so cumming isn't the natural end of sex now? Wow science, you've explained the world. Great job. Makes perfect sense.

If, in some cataclysm, all of scientific knowledge were to be destroyed, and only one sentence passed on to the next generation of creatures, what statement would contain the most information in the fewest words?

why do kids tend to dislike vegetables? doesnt it make evolutionary sense to nutritionmaxx especially as a growing person in need of nutrients?

Just finished reading this. What am I supposed to do now?

I invented the question mark AMA

Why isn't Pluto considered a planet?

Love to see it.

Will /sci/ be participating in nofap this year?

Can you prove there is something rather than nothing? Imagine you have a real Universe with humans inside it, and a non-existent Universe with humans inside it. How could they tell the difference?

Space Puck - edition previous >>17080735

It’s fascinating to watch people try to claim ownership of a pipeline that they don't have control of

Well /sci/?